0
Why do some delegates fear that a single executive might create a monarchy or assume tyrannical powers?
Wiki User
∙ 7y ago
All of the men who wrote the constitution had lived under a monarchy and they didn't fight to have another one rule their lives. They wanted to ensure that the government was on dominant by one office or branch.
Wiki User
∙ 7y ago
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Describe the typical American opinion of monarchy?
I'll assume you are referring to constitutional monarchy, like that in the UK. There is no one typical opinion, but I would say most opinions fall into one of two categories: -Those the find the monarchy to be quaint and archachic and sometimes even a little silly, but generally a charming way to identify on a patriotic level. -Those that draw from America's historic revolt against England and view monarchy as tyrannical regardless of any limitations on power.
Was princess Margaret trained to assume the monarchy in the event Elizabeth could not?
yes
What is an example of the executive action?
i assume you're referring to the executive branch of government.Answer: The President's ability to veto a bill
What is a type of government where only a few people have power?
Executive i assume. Since it has the president and such.
What is the most common type of civilization in human history?
I assume you mean forms of government, in which case it would be monarchy.
What is Executive Double Room?
Its just a name of a room type. The rooms facilities could alter from hotel to hotel. You could assume its not there standard room, but thats about it.
Does Johnny Depp have ties to The Family?
I will assume you mean the royal family of Great Britian. There have been claims that Depp's ancestors were somehow related to the British monarchy but I have know idea if it is a fact.
What is the shift of power from the king to parliament?
The Glorious Revolution occurred in 1689 and was a shift of political power from the British Monarchy to Parliament. The Monarchy remains the central focus of the government, but Parliament assume much of the power of the finances and the ability to pass laws.
How do executive agencies help carry out and shape public policies?
The president is responsible for implementing and enforcing the laws written by Congress and, to that end, appoints the heads of the federal agencies, including the Cabinet. The Vice President is also part of the Executive Branch, ready to assume the Presidency should the need arise. I got this information from the website (https://www.whitehouse.gov/1600/executive-branch)
What position did Harrison assume from 1983 to 1990?
executive vice president and head of the U.S. corporate division; 1986, head, North America division; 1987-1989, group executive in charge of the Banking and Corporate Finance Group; 1990-, vice chairman, institutional banking
What position did Hertrich assume in the 2000s?
DASA, 1996-2000, executive committee member; DaimlerChrysler Aerospace AG, 2000, president and CEO; European Aeronautic Defense and Space Company (EADS), 2000- Co-CEO, chairman of executive committee, and member of board of management
Why could Germany be described as a military monarchy in the 1800's?
I assume that you are asking about Germany from 1871 onwards. Historians do not have a neat term to describe the political structure (type of government) of Germany in the period 1871-1918. Perhaps the best description would be a quasi-abolute monarchy with an emerging democracy ... Certainly, the army was immensely influential.
