Language must be genetically innate since children can learn language at the same time. Deaf children did not learn speech hence showing that their language capacity did not depend on the teeth and vocal cords there human offsprings are born with special capacity of language.
If these deaf children do not develop speech first, then their language ability would not seem to depend on those physical adaptations of the teeth, larynx, etc. That are involved in speaking. If all children (including those born deaf) can acquire language at about the same time, they must be born with a special capacity to do so. The conclusion is that it must be innate and hence genetically.
Young deaf children who become fluent in sign language are often cited in support of the innateness hypothesis because it demonstrates that language acquisition is not dependent on auditory input. This challenges the idea that exposure to spoken language is necessary for linguistic development, suggesting instead that humans have an innate capacity for language acquisition that can manifest through different modalities, such as sign language.
WHY DO YOU THINK THAT YOUNG DEAF CHILDREN WHO BECOME FLUENT IN SIGN LANGUAGE WOULD BE CITED IN SUPPORT OF THE INNATENESS HYPOTHESIS?
If these deaf children do not develop speech first, then their language ability
would not seem to depend on those physical adaptations of the teeth, larynx, etc.
that are involved in speaking. If all children (including those born deaf) can
acquire language at about the same time, they must be born with a special
capacity to do so. The conclusion is that it must be innate and hence genetically
determined.
The innateness hypothesis suggests that humans are born with the innate capacity for language acquisition. Young deaf children who become fluent in sign language support this hypothesis, as they demonstrate the ability to naturally acquire language through exposure to visual-manual communication without auditory input. This highlights the inherent predisposition for language development in humans, regardless of the modality of communication.
To adapt strategies for children with English as a second language and communication difficulties, use visuals, gestures, and simplified language to aid in understanding. Encourage the use of their native language as needed, and provide extra support and patience during communication. Consider utilizing bilingual resources and working closely with families and support services to help bridge the language barrier.
Three factors that influence language development in children are genetic predisposition, environmental exposure to language, and social interactions with caregivers and peers. Genetic factors can determine a child's language abilities, while exposure to a rich language environment and frequent interactions with others help to support and enhance their language skills.
poverty of stimulus argument.
BSL (British Sign Language) can support communication with children by providing a visual and tactile way for them to understand and express themselves. It can help children who have hearing impairments or processing disorders to communicate more effectively. BSL can also be used to enhance language development and literacy skills in all children.
How do you support children's play and communication development in bilingual and multilingual settings and where children learn through an additional language?
If your hypothesis is totally incorrect then it is quite likely that the data will not support it.
An experiment might not support a hypothesis even if the hypothesis is correct because if the conclusion
when results from the experiments repeatedly fail to support the hypothesis.
Amend or discard the hypothesis
Amend or discard the hypothesis
Discard or change the hypothesis.
You obtain objective evidence to support it by undertaking experiments designed to test the veracity of the hypothesis.
Evidence that family members with similar tongue-curling abilities share genetic similarities, such as specific gene variations or inheritance patterns, would support the hypothesis. Comparative studies across generations within families could also show a strong correlation between the ability to curl the tongue and genetic relatedness. Additionally, observing consistent tongue-curling abilities in offspring of parents who can curl their tongues may further support the genetic basis of this trait.
so you have to put in did it help you explain your hypothesis
Change or abandon your hypothesis.
Revise or discard your hypothesis.