answersLogoWhite

0


Want this question answered?

Be notified when an answer is posted

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Why does bias usually make a source less reliable for historians?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

Why should historians look for bias in a source?

Historians would be wise to look for bias in a source because bias can influence the way the writer relayed the information. Sources free from bias are to be the most trusted.


The time and place rule determines that the a source and its creator were to an event in the past the more valuable the source will be?

Historians use the time and place rule because the source is deemed to be more reliable. The other rule historians use is the bias rule that says everyone will be biased in some way when recounting events.


To determine whether a piece of historical evidence is reliable historians generally?

Answer this question… check to see if the information in the source is confirmed by other sources.


How is a bias source of use to a historian?

It helps historians to remember to check other sources for facts.


Is bias a secondary source?

Bias is not a secondary source. In terms of historical and academic research and writing, secondary sources are articles and books written by historians and other academics. Secondary sources can be biased based on when the source was written and the author.Ê


What makes a source reliable?

created by an educated expert and published in an academic journal is not influenced by a bias


How is bias usful to historians?

Bias can be useful to historians by allowing them to learn about people's opinions and beliefs.


Is bias useful to historians?

yes


A credible source will have?

A credible source will have accurate and up-to-date information, be written by an expert or someone with expertise in the field, cite their sources, and be free from bias or personal opinions.


What is a more reliable source independent media or mainstream media?

Mainstream News media because journalists are trained to remove personal bias from articles


Why do historians need to be worried about reports with bias in them?

Historians need to be concerned about reports with bias because bias can distort the accuracy and objectivity of historical information. It can lead to incomplete or misleading interpretations of events, which can impact the overall understanding of the past. Historians strive to present a balanced and unbiased view of history to ensure the integrity of their research and analysis.


What do Historians and researchers primarily base their research on?

bias or primary