It is attracted by its own nucleus. It is the vector energy, mcv, that prevents it from falling into the nucleus. The vector energy creates an centrifugal forces that balances the nucleus centripetal forces : e^2zc/2r^2 = mcv/r cos(RV) provides the balance and the redshift and the redshift for electrons cos(RV) = alpha/n. The cos(RV) is the tangent angle needed to balance the attraction of the nucleus.
The nucleus of an atom, having a positive charge, exerts an attractive force on the atom's negative electrons.
Nothing. Neither atoms nor their components (e.g. nucleus, electrons) want anything. They have no will or thought of any kind. Anthropomorphizing natural phenomena in this way only interferes with proper understanding of reality.
No. The electrons nearest the nucleus have the lowest energy. The highestenergy electron is one that's out on its own, not bound to any nucleus.
The energy change that occurs when an electron is added to a neutral atom. This is usually exothermic. Noble Gases are excluded from this. Equation: X(element)+e-(electron)---------> X-1+ energy
On the outside of an atom, you will find the electron cloud, which consists of negatively charged electrons orbiting around the positively charged nucleus. The electron cloud is where most of the atom's volume is located.
The nucleus of an atom, having a positive charge, exerts an attractive force on the atom's negative electrons.
No, it is never to be found in the nucleus, it is in electron orbits or 'shells', each with its own the energy level.
The electron in each atom starts to notice the proton of the other atom. As a result, it becomes attracted not only to its own proton, but to the proton of the other atom as well. ... And electrons tend to repel each other.
The number of protons in an atom's nucleus is its atomic number. Each element has its own unique atomic number. An individual atom's atomic mass is the sum of the masses of the protons, neutrons, and electrons in the atom.
do you mean outside of a nucleus?if so, electronsAnother AnswerIf we were small enough to see the individual parts of an atom, outside the atom would be more space. As we get larger, heading back to our own size, at a certain scale we would see the atom's vibration and ripples in space turn into the molecular boundary. As we continue to return to our normal size, we would see the billions of atoms in a cubic mm. As we reach our normal size, we would see the normal world which is made up from the countless number of molecules/atoms arraigned in incredible combinations.
Nothing. Neither atoms nor their components (e.g. nucleus, electrons) want anything. They have no will or thought of any kind. Anthropomorphizing natural phenomena in this way only interferes with proper understanding of reality.
You don't really need equipment to change the nucleus of an atom. If the atom is radioactive, then it is inherently unstable, and it will change of its own accord, and on its own time frame, relative to half-life.
electrons are way way far away from the center (nucleus) of the atom. lets say the nucleus was the size of a basketball, the electrons would be marbles that are flying around miles away from the nucleus. this is one of the greatest mysteries of the atom, it's really taxing on the imagination when you realize how much of the atom is made up of empty space, and then to think about how everything is made up of atoms, that means everything is nearly 99.9% empty space.ContinuationThe nucleus of an atom is made up of protons and sometimes neutrons. The electron in orbit around the nucleus is ~1800 times smaller than a proton.We perceive everything from the macro side of the molecular boundary. Atoms naturally roll and tumble as they wander through space, and as such, they appear as vibrating spheroids from our perspective.
The electrons in the atom surround the nucleus, and the higher the atomic number of the element the more electrons there are. Unless it is ionised, there will be an equal number of protons in the nucleus and electrons surrounding the atom. Ideas of how the electrons are arranged have evolved from imagining them to be in orbit around the nucleus, like a small solar system, to modern ideas of quantum physics where it is best to imagine them as an electron 'cloud'. However the idea of electron shells is still useful, this is as imagined by Bohr in the twenties of the last century, where concentric shells contain fixed numbers of electrons according to strict rules on their composition. Your query on 'electron shielding' is probably to do with these electron shells, and the more shells there are determines the effective size of the atom. You can read more in the link below
No. The electrons nearest the nucleus have the lowest energy. The highestenergy electron is one that's out on its own, not bound to any nucleus.
An atom is composed of electrons(-), protons(+), and neutrons( ). The nucleus is composed of neutrons and protons, and the electrons surround it.
4 electrons