New York is a City that has everything, it's simply a leader in the nation, in the continent, in the world in every city aspect, Chicago neither of that. NY is unique, chicago is like others good cities, but isn't at the same level as the Big Apple, also can't offer the same things that NY nor oportunities.
It's impossible to answer because saying Chicago is better than New York is an opinion. Both cities are good and bad for different reasons.
Chicago is definitely bigger than San Francisco. San Francisco definitely has milder weather than Chicago. Each city has its own assets and liabilities. One is not better than the other ... just different.
I personally don't think that New York is trying to be like Chicago. I actually think that New York is way better than Chicago depending on where in New York you are. They both just happen to be big cities with much of the same atmospheres that a big city would have.
cuz
definitely Chicago pizza
New York has a greater population than both Chicago and Los Angeles combined. However, in landmass, Los Angeles and Chicago combined are bigger than New York.
New York has more pollution than Chicago. Chicago is one of the leaders in "green" U.S. cities. The city is also planned with pollution controls and alleys (to prevent garbage and other waste from gathering on the streets).
new york is way better than paris.
Time to get a better pizza than you would have gotten in New York! J/K - It's 6:00... an hour earlier.
It depends on the individual. New York is the bigger, more "cosmopolitan" of the two.
No new york is $#!% and there people are @$$#*!^$
new york was better than the other colonies because people from Europe were entering new york and also new york had the biggest port in 13 colonies
Chicago is west of New York.