its expensive to dispose of the waste and the initial machinery is expensive to build.
Extracting energy from nuclear fuels is more expensive than extracting energy from fossil fuels.
No one has found a way to get rid of nuclear wastes, there is a lot of security dealing with nuclear power, an accident at a nuclear reactor can be dangerous for miles around and for years to come. Except for hydrogen bombs, nuclear fusion power has not been harnessed by people for more than a few seconds. Considering that all a nuclear (fission) power plant does is to boil water and turn it into steam, there are better ways of making electricity than nuclear power (except for submarines and aircraft carriers). Remember Three Mile Island and Chernobyl? That's why nuclear power is so expensive.
extracting energy from nuclear fuels is more expensive than extracting energy from fossil fuels
It costs more to obtain the fuel
It contains a model nuclear reactor. It used to be double this price.
yes it is very expensive.
Extracting energy from nuclear fuels is more expensive than extracting energy from fossil fuels.
No one has found a way to get rid of nuclear wastes, there is a lot of security dealing with nuclear power, an accident at a nuclear reactor can be dangerous for miles around and for years to come. Except for hydrogen bombs, nuclear fusion power has not been harnessed by people for more than a few seconds. Considering that all a nuclear (fission) power plant does is to boil water and turn it into steam, there are better ways of making electricity than nuclear power (except for submarines and aircraft carriers). Remember Three Mile Island and Chernobyl? That's why nuclear power is so expensive.
Extremely so. Every estimate given that shows how cheap it is ALWAYS ignores "hidden" costs.
because they have to safetly turn of the core of the reactor and dispose of the dangeouse chemicals used
Uranium is more expensive, but the kWh in a nuclear power plant is more cheaper.
Nuclear fusion rocket technology is too expensive to use as a means for power production.
extracting energy from nuclear fuels is more expensive than extracting energy from fossil fuels
Wind power can be quite costly over time, but nuclear power creates wastes that cost a lot of money to dispose of, let alone getting the nuclear rods in the first place. However, nuclear power can provide much more power than wind power, so they are more or less equals.
Yes, it generally is but a nuclear plant could refer to nuclear reactors which are basically the things that produce the power. So in essence, yes, a nuclear plant is the same thing as a nuclear power station
We should not have nuclear power in the future because so many things can happen; for example people can get skin cancer and can cause high level radioactive waste/and it is very expensive and also nuclear power can cause small accidents. the nuclear power looks like a dick with wee coming out (that is a very true fact) i am very picc or i dont want skin cancer
It costs more to obtain the fuel