0
Want this question answered?
Be notified when an answer is posted
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Civilian rule is better than Military rule?
Well actually to be a good community you need both because think of segregation. If it were civilian rule black people would still be in separate schools and public places than white people. Military rule is bad sometimes because it may turn into a dictatorship
How many people from each country died in World War 2?
Germany military - 3,250,000 civilian - 2,350,000 Italy military - 226,900 civilian - 60,000 Japan military - 1,740,000 civilian - 393,400 US military 405,000 civilian - 68 (Pearl Harbor) France military 122,000 civilian - 470,000 England military - 305,800 civilian - 6,700,000 Russia military - 11,000,000 civilian - 6,700,000 China military - 1,400,000 civilian - 8,000,000 Poland- from 5.5m to 6.5m all together (not caunting many soldiers who fleed the country and joined army in other countries)
Support the motion which says civil rule is better than military rule?
cilivian rule is better than military because cilivian are more civilized than the military they are more peaceful than military
When does civilian law supersede military law?
Civilian law is typically always in place. Military law is only invoked in extreme emergencies. However, military personnel are always subject to military law. The Adjutant General will negotiate with the civilian authorities if there is any situation where it is not definite as to which takes precedence. Actually, in the United States, no military person (or, for that matter, anyone other than the Judical Branch) can arbitrarily decide to enforce military law in a place where it is not currently in place. Not even the President can decide to apply military law in a place where civil law is currently in force (indeed, this is one of the major contentious issues around the classification of terrorists as "enemy combatants", and the legality of this move is still being subject to litigation). The misnowmer "martial law" does not actually apply Military Law, but rather enforce a certain subsection of civilian law. For instance, let's say that there is major rioting in a city, and the National Guard is called in to restore order, and "martial law" is declared by the city's major (or perhaps, the state governor). Members of the National Guard are subject to Military law, and any infractions they commit will naturally be covered by military trial. HOWEVER, should a National Guardsman capture a looter (or other criminal), they are then prosecuted under CIVILIAN LAW, even though "martial law" was declared. Martial law in this case is a specific subsection of civilian law, which criminalizes certain activities which are normally permissible under ordinary civilian law. Back to the original question: as Congress is the creator of both military and civilian law, it can decide whether civilian or military law applies in a situation where the military normally has first jurisdiction. There are a myriad number of places this can occur, so naming them all is not possible. In addition, the Constitution is still the highest law of the land, and is supreme over both military and civilian law. Do note that many crimes are not covered by military law, but only civilian law, so it is entirely possible for a person normally subject to military jurisdiction to be prosecuted by civilian authorities without military acquiecence. For example, Insider Trading is a civilian crime, with no military equivalent, so it would be entirely possible to charge a military serviceperson on a military base with this civilian crime.
Reasons why is military better than civilian rule in Nigeria?
That's a very debateable point. Military governments traditionally are extremely restrictive in allowing personal freedoms of their citizens, and often result in a failed state forming due to mass insurrection against the military government forming. The advantage of it, at least from the standpoint of the country's leaders, is that it's a direct dictatorship, where the directives of the government can be carried out without being tied up by the political process. Whether it's actually advantageous for the citizens of Nigeria, is questionable at best.another advantage is public opinion which i think is a good issue to look at.
Points on Military government is more suitable for Nigeria than Sivilian government?
Points on Military government is better than Civilian government
Are military rules better than civilian rules?
there are more rules in military than civilian
Is civilian government better than military government?
Yes! Civillian rule is much better cus it is the power of the people while millitary rule is done through coercion.....
Civil rule preferable to military rule?
civilian rule is better than military rule because there is freedom and peace in the nation better than when the military was ruling us
What is civilian regime?
A civilian regime refers to a government that is predominantly made up of civilian leaders who are not part of the military. In a civilian regime, power is usually vested in elected officials and civilian institutions, rather than military authorities.
What does civilian of the military mean?
Civilian control of the military is a doctrine in militaryand political science that places ultimate responsibility for a country's strategic decision-making in the hands of the civilian political leadership, rather than professional military officers.
What does civilian control of the military mean?
Civilian control of the military is a doctrine in militaryand political science that places ultimate responsibility for a country's strategic decision-making in the hands of the civilian political leadership, rather than professional military officers.
Is military rule better than civilian rule?
Well actually to be a good community you need both because think of segregation. If it were civilian rule black people would still be in separate schools and public places than white people. Military rule is bad sometimes because it may turn into a Dictatorship
What clothing did the roman soldiers wear?
For ordinary clothing the Roman soldier wore his military tunic (a tunic that was shorter than the standard civilian tunic) his soldiers' belt and his military boots. He also had a military cloak or "sagum".For ordinary clothing the Roman soldier wore his military tunic (a tunic that was shorter than the standard civilian tunic) his soldiers' belt and his military boots. He also had a military cloak or "sagum".For ordinary clothing the Roman soldier wore his military tunic (a tunic that was shorter than the standard civilian tunic) his soldiers' belt and his military boots. He also had a military cloak or "sagum".For ordinary clothing the Roman soldier wore his military tunic (a tunic that was shorter than the standard civilian tunic) his soldiers' belt and his military boots. He also had a military cloak or "sagum".For ordinary clothing the Roman soldier wore his military tunic (a tunic that was shorter than the standard civilian tunic) his soldiers' belt and his military boots. He also had a military cloak or "sagum".For ordinary clothing the Roman soldier wore his military tunic (a tunic that was shorter than the standard civilian tunic) his soldiers' belt and his military boots. He also had a military cloak or "sagum".For ordinary clothing the Roman soldier wore his military tunic (a tunic that was shorter than the standard civilian tunic) his soldiers' belt and his military boots. He also had a military cloak or "sagum".For ordinary clothing the Roman soldier wore his military tunic (a tunic that was shorter than the standard civilian tunic) his soldiers' belt and his military boots. He also had a military cloak or "sagum".For ordinary clothing the Roman soldier wore his military tunic (a tunic that was shorter than the standard civilian tunic) his soldiers' belt and his military boots. He also had a military cloak or "sagum".
Advantage of civilian regime?
It is more civilized and humane. NOBAMA
Civilian rule is better than Military rule?
Well actually to be a good community you need both because think of segregation. If it were civilian rule black people would still be in separate schools and public places than white people. Military rule is bad sometimes because it may turn into a dictatorship
Can military doctors be sued?
Yes, military doctors can be sued, but the process is different than suing civilian doctors. The doctrine of "Feres v. United States" prohibits active-duty military personnel from bringing medical malpractice claims against the federal government. However, there are some exceptions to this rule, such as cases involving civilian employees of the military or medical treatment provided to dependents of military personnel.
