0
As a philosopher, I have to ask, can this be answered with a sentence or paragraph? And would we want to answer it like that? For some the answer could be a sentence, for others it might take a bit more. Philosophy is the ultimate quest a human can take, it forces the individual to question his own validity. His own lack of expertise in the many different areas of life. Mostly, language, math, and science. Although the basic premise of philosophy, given up front to a student, may scare off would-be honest philosophers. The idea is that, you realize you are not God, and you basically figure out where you fit in. Hopefully you fit in somewhere between God and a Cockroach. The idea is that, from the point of your own honest assessment, of where you are, you move away from being a cockroach, and move towards being more like God. By questioning your own actions, and motivations. Your level of self truth. This usually frees the individual up to clean up fields of science, that are normally in disarray. Basically, changing the world from flat to spherical again. By stopping lightning from killing bell tower ringers, with a simple lightning rod. Or allow once again man to walk on other heavenly bodies other then earth. Although Scorates was perhaps the founding father of soul searching. It was Benjamin Franklin that took it up another notch. By acts of unselfishness, he advanced science and medicine to amazing new heights in just a few years. He would not patent his inventions, but rather made them available to all. Part of the truth is, we can better relate to Benjamin Franklin then we can Socrates. Benjamin Franklin was also in a place that allowed much more rapid change. But both men cause a slight embarrassment to modern man. Because we have not advanced much from where they were. Benjamin Franklin, learned perhaps from the lessons of Socrates and Jesus. What a government, and people, gone mad, will do to honest stand up citizens. And adjusted his approach to the problem accordingly. Benjamin Franklin although not a Christian, revered Jesus for his, actions, lessons and warning. But you cannot take anything away from the man that created the foundation for truth, Socrates. Truth makes the kind of community where patents are not necessary. And your word is worth more then any sum of paper notes. Stellar individuals that followed Socrates, Jesus Christ and others that stood and died for truth. Had the advantage of the lessons and failures of these original brave men. I am sure that neither Socrates or Jesus would want any of us, to suffer their fate for being truthful. However they both have gotten the message to us, that it is better to die an honest man, then to be a hypocrite, a coward. Philosophy gets its bad name from poor philosophers, not honestly questioning their own moral collapse, or their real misunderstandings. But rather questioning reality, until they actually distort it. By their want of answers to questions, that they can understand. The bottom line, real philosophy, is about truth. If a great scientist is doing an experiment, if he is truthful, he will realize that much of his skills in chemistry, come from his mothers cooking. And the ingredients and methods of preparation and interaction between the substances. The failed cakes and casseroles and the successful ones, all added to his skill. An oil fire in his mothers or aunts kitchen might have saved the chemists life, while experimenting. This chemist if he does realize the source of his success, will be able to share the success of his experiment, and the many ways it might have failed. Because he can relay the true source of its success. And relay methods and actions to prevent other scientists from failure in their lab, and to avoid accidents. Basically a philosopher, takes out the suicidal aspect of contest or status quest. Those things become hearty comedy amongst fellow scientists. Philosophers are misunderstood, because some believe we look up into space and just dream about nonsense. However philosophers are usually the only ones that totally grasp any field. Because they have good knowledge in all fields of science, math and language. "Universal knowledge" is its own definition, you cannot just shun the rest of the fields of science, and perfect some tiny portion of knowledge in one field. All history totally forbids your success. You may achieve some projects success. But in moving back to see the whole picture, you will have conceded to and helped the destruction of truth in other fields and your own. Your success will be short lived, your project misunderstood and not duplicated well. An honest philosopher can be depressing because, he does see the whole picture. And sometimes the picture is ugly. However, that is fuel to a real philosopher. Most do not know the speed at which Benjamin Franklin was moving to bring about a higher form of living. From a very ugly picture of slavery, and the destruction of the importance of the soul. The founding fathers of America were all amazing philosophers.
Wiki User
∙ 15y ago
Philosophy is considered a universal science because it examines fundamental questions about existence, knowledge, ethics, and reality that are relevant to all humans regardless of culture, time period, or location. Its methods and principles can be applied across various disciplines and help to provide a deeper understanding of the world and our place in it.
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Why is philosophy considered to be a science?
Philosophy is not typically considered a science because it does not rely on empirical evidence or follow the scientific method. It is more concerned with abstract concepts, logic, and ethics rather than systematic observation and experimentation. However, some branches of philosophy, like philosophy of science or philosophy of mind, may intersect with scientific disciplines.
Is philosophy considered a science?
No, philosophy is not considered a science. While both disciplines aim to understand the world and address fundamental questions, they do so using different methodologies and approaches. Philosophy focuses on questions of existence, knowledge, values, ethics, and reasoning, while science is more concerned with empirically testing and investigating the natural world.
Do you consider philosophy as a parent science?
Philosophy is often considered a foundational discipline that explores fundamental questions about existence, knowledge, ethics, and reality. While philosophy may not be a parent science in the traditional sense of the term, it provides the theoretical framework and critical thinking skills that underpin many other disciplines, including the natural and social sciences.
Is Philosophy a science or is it more than a science?
Philosophy is not considered a science in the traditional sense because it does not rely on empirical methods like observation and experimentation. Instead, it focuses on questions about existence, knowledge, values, reason, mind, and language that are often beyond the scope of scientific inquiry. It can be seen as a distinct and complementary discipline to the sciences.
What is the definition of philosophy of science?
Philosophy of science is a branch of philosophy that examines the foundations, methods, and implications of science. It explores questions about the nature of scientific knowledge, the scientific method, and the relationship between science and other areas of human inquiry.
Do you consider philosophy as a parent science?
Philosophy is often considered a foundational discipline that explores fundamental questions about existence, knowledge, ethics, and reality. While philosophy may not be a parent science in the traditional sense of the term, it provides the theoretical framework and critical thinking skills that underpin many other disciplines, including the natural and social sciences.
Philosophy is not considered science because it lacks what?
Experimentation
Why isn't philosophy considered science?
Philosophy and science have different methodologies and goals. While science relies on empirical observation and experimentation to understand the natural world, philosophy explores fundamental questions about existence, knowledge, values, and the nature of reality through reasoning and critical analysis. Though both fields seek to uncover truth and deepen understanding, they employ distinct approaches and are concerned with different aspects of knowledge.
Philosophy as a universal science?
Philosophy is a fictitious subject because it depends upon the superiority of logic. The experiences are differing man to man based on witnesses.
Why philosophy considered as queen of all science?
because it is a common word
Is philosophy considered a science?
No, philosophy is not considered a science. While both disciplines aim to understand the world and address fundamental questions, they do so using different methodologies and approaches. Philosophy focuses on questions of existence, knowledge, values, ethics, and reasoning, while science is more concerned with empirically testing and investigating the natural world.
What define logic as an science?
Yes, Logic is now considered a branch of Science not of Philosophy anymore. In the old days Logic is formerly a branch of Philosophy.
Why is philosophy considered to be a science?
Philosophy is not typically considered a science because it does not rely on empirical evidence or follow the scientific method. It is more concerned with abstract concepts, logic, and ethics rather than systematic observation and experimentation. However, some branches of philosophy, like philosophy of science or philosophy of mind, may intersect with scientific disciplines.
What has the author James H Fetzer written?
James H. Fetzer has written: 'Philosophy and Cognitive Science' 'Philosophy of science' -- subject(s): Science, Philosophy 'Computers and cognition' -- subject(s): Cognitive science 'Glossary of epistemology/philosophy of science' -- subject(s): Dictionaries, Knowledge, Theory of, Philosophy, Science, Theory of Knowledge 'Artificial intelligence' -- subject(s): Artificial intelligence 'Philosophy and cognitive science' -- subject(s): Philosophy and cognitive science
What did isaac newton contribute to science?
He Invented The 3 Laws Of Motion.ANSWER2:The idea of Universal Gravitation, The Mathematical Principles of Natural Philosophy< Reflection Telescopes and the Theory of Light.his life to revel the facts of science
Is Philosophy a science or is it more than a science?
Philosophy is not considered a science in the traditional sense because it does not rely on empirical methods like observation and experimentation. Instead, it focuses on questions about existence, knowledge, values, reason, mind, and language that are often beyond the scope of scientific inquiry. It can be seen as a distinct and complementary discipline to the sciences.
How do you differentiate philosophy as a field of study from science?
Philosophy focuses on fundamental questions about existence, knowledge, values, reason, mind, and language, often using logical reasoning and critical analysis. Science, on the other hand, is more concerned with empirical investigations, conducting experiments and observations to test hypotheses about the natural world. While both seek to understand the world and human experience, they differ in their methods and scope of inquiry.
