Look mate, I know you're here because you want your homework answered, IT'S NOT HAPPENIN' so go find another website , aight?
Of course. In fact, atheists are more accepting of people who think differently because they have no religious agenda to promote, no beliefs they feel the need to press on others.~Above answer is well put, but i might add, i myself do not accept the religious beliefs of another person, but i can accept the person. I mean, by 'accept' i do not share the belief, nor admire it in anyway, but rather, i accept the person, and accept their right to believe as they wish.
Communists
A religious traveler in Medieval times might have been called a minstrel. There were also groups of people that believed in a united cause that were called crusaders during that time.
It might be a strange answer but some religious groups! Some of the powers-that-be felt that excessive religious tolerance was a liability and angled off against any even potentially interfaith youth groups, for example the Y.M.C.A. They may have extended this to the Girl Scouts when it was in its early days.
No characteristics of the traditional epic hero might be difficult for readers of today to accept and assimilate, except their unreasonable religious fervour and neglect of women. And there is one other thing, their accepting slavery and bondage as a thing not to be revolted against.
No the intent of the groups is what makes the difference although appearance based on level of fanaticism might look similar
Whether religious people should accept contraception varies among different faiths. Some religious groups permit the use of contraception under certain circumstances, while others may consider it immoral. It ultimately depends on an individual's interpretation of their religion's teachings and beliefs.
Yes, Jehovah's Witnesses have no religious prohibition to having female doctore. Whether they accept on therefore would reflect their personal reference rather than a religious mandate.Witnesses might have their own doctors that know them specifically and know that they don't accept blood tranfusions, but other than that, there's no real controversy in the gender of the Doctor.I go to Morris County School of Technology, Academy for Health Care Science and so far in dynamics for religion we discussed it is solely on the persons preference. Yes you should take their religious preferences but it is up to the person.
A religious believer might treat animals in a way that they believe their god would. This might include respect or sacrifices.
Denominations are sub-groups of a "faith" or "religion" and are typified by the many sub-groups within Christianity, such as Methodist, Baptist, etc. The sub-groups within Judaism and Islam might also be termed denominations. The Assyrians were an ancient culture whose religion was "polytheistic", that is, they believed in many gods. They followed Ashur as their chief god.
there might not be enough proof
If you are religious you might say God makes tornadoes. However, from a scientific standpoint the answer is nobody. Tornadoes are a natural phenomenon that result from a certain set of weather conditions, not the actions of any person or persons.