0
Why might the size if the Roman Empire be a problem for Roman emperors?
Wiki User
∙ 6y ago
The sheer size of the Roman Empire presented communication problems, big time. If a message or order went out from Rome for say, Egypt, it would have to go overland to a seaport, get on a ship and then land travel once more in order to get to its destination in Egypt. (Of course the city of Alexandria was exempt from this last stage of land travel). Even though the Roman roads were excellent and imperial messengers had the right of way, they were still limited to the speed a horse could maintain and the whims of the sea with its storms. Communications of orders, reports, tax revenues, new imperial directives, orders for military movements, all took time and it is one of the amazements of the Roman empire that they managed to communicate in the "quick" time that they did.
The sheer size of the Roman empire presented communication problems, big time. If a message or order went out from Rome for say, Egypt, it would have to go overland to a seaport, get on a ship and then land travel once more in order to get to its destination in Egypt. (Of course the city of Alexandria was exempt from this last stage of land travel). Even though the Roman roads were excellent and imperial messengers had the right of way, they were still limited to the speed a horse could maintain and the whims of the sea with its storms. Communications of orders, reports, tax revenues, new imperial directives, orders for military movements, all took time and it is one of the amazements of the Roman empire that they managed to communicate in the "quick" time that they did.
The sheer size of the Roman empire presented communication problems, big time. If a message or order went out from Rome for say, Egypt, it would have to go overland to a seaport, get on a ship and then land travel once more in order to get to its destination in Egypt. (Of course the city of Alexandria was exempt from this last stage of land travel). Even though the Roman roads were excellent and imperial messengers had the right of way, they were still limited to the speed a horse could maintain and the whims of the sea with its storms. Communications of orders, reports, tax revenues, new imperial directives, orders for military movements, all took time and it is one of the amazements of the Roman empire that they managed to communicate in the "quick" time that they did.
The sheer size of the Roman empire presented communication problems, big time. If a message or order went out from Rome for say, Egypt, it would have to go overland to a seaport, get on a ship and then land travel once more in order to get to its destination in Egypt. (Of course the city of Alexandria was exempt from this last stage of land travel). Even though the Roman roads were excellent and imperial messengers had the right of way, they were still limited to the speed a horse could maintain and the whims of the sea with its storms. Communications of orders, reports, tax revenues, new imperial directives, orders for military movements, all took time and it is one of the amazements of the Roman empire that they managed to communicate in the "quick" time that they did.
The sheer size of the Roman empire presented communication problems, big time. If a message or order went out from Rome for say, Egypt, it would have to go overland to a seaport, get on a ship and then land travel once more in order to get to its destination in Egypt. (Of course the city of Alexandria was exempt from this last stage of land travel). Even though the Roman roads were excellent and imperial messengers had the right of way, they were still limited to the speed a horse could maintain and the whims of the sea with its storms. Communications of orders, reports, tax revenues, new imperial directives, orders for military movements, all took time and it is one of the amazements of the Roman empire that they managed to communicate in the "quick" time that they did.
The sheer size of the Roman empire presented communication problems, big time. If a message or order went out from Rome for say, Egypt, it would have to go overland to a seaport, get on a ship and then land travel once more in order to get to its destination in Egypt. (Of course the city of Alexandria was exempt from this last stage of land travel). Even though the Roman roads were excellent and imperial messengers had the right of way, they were still limited to the speed a horse could maintain and the whims of the sea with its storms. Communications of orders, reports, tax revenues, new imperial directives, orders for military movements, all took time and it is one of the amazements of the Roman empire that they managed to communicate in the "quick" time that they did.
The sheer size of the Roman empire presented communication problems, big time. If a message or order went out from Rome for say, Egypt, it would have to go overland to a seaport, get on a ship and then land travel once more in order to get to its destination in Egypt. (Of course the city of Alexandria was exempt from this last stage of land travel). Even though the Roman roads were excellent and imperial messengers had the right of way, they were still limited to the speed a horse could maintain and the whims of the sea with its storms. Communications of orders, reports, tax revenues, new imperial directives, orders for military movements, all took time and it is one of the amazements of the Roman empire that they managed to communicate in the "quick" time that they did.
The sheer size of the Roman empire presented communication problems, big time. If a message or order went out from Rome for say, Egypt, it would have to go overland to a seaport, get on a ship and then land travel once more in order to get to its destination in Egypt. (Of course the city of Alexandria was exempt from this last stage of land travel). Even though the Roman roads were excellent and imperial messengers had the right of way, they were still limited to the speed a horse could maintain and the whims of the sea with its storms. Communications of orders, reports, tax revenues, new imperial directives, orders for military movements, all took time and it is one of the amazements of the Roman empire that they managed to communicate in the "quick" time that they did.
The sheer size of the Roman empire presented communication problems, big time. If a message or order went out from Rome for say, Egypt, it would have to go overland to a seaport, get on a ship and then land travel once more in order to get to its destination in Egypt. (Of course the city of Alexandria was exempt from this last stage of land travel). Even though the Roman roads were excellent and imperial messengers had the right of way, they were still limited to the speed a horse could maintain and the whims of the sea with its storms. Communications of orders, reports, tax revenues, new imperial directives, orders for military movements, all took time and it is one of the amazements of the Roman empire that they managed to communicate in the "quick" time that they did.
Wiki User
∙ 11y ago
Wiki User
∙ 6y agoIn a pre-mechanical transport and telecommunications era, the great distances made central governance and response too difficult, which led to the split of the empire into four separate entities, each led by an emperor or caesar.
Wiki User
∙ 12y agoCommunications were a big problem with the size of the Roman empire. It could take a couple or three weeks for a message to get from Rome to, say, Alexandria. While the Roman roads made communications good in Italy and the continent, many cities had to be reached by roads and ships. Traveling by ship was slow and time consuming. There was also the problem of tax revenue from the provinces. Because of some of the long distances, many times part of the revenue "disappeared" in transit. Manpower for the army to defend the empire was also a problem which had to be dealt with by incorporating provincials into the army.
Wiki User
∙ 11y agoThe sheer size of the Roman empire presented communication problems, big time. If a message or order went out from Rome for say, Egypt, it would have to go overland to a seaport, get on a ship and then land travel once more in order to get to its destination in Egypt. (Of course the city of Alexandria was exempt from this last stage of land travel). Even though the Roman roads were excellent and imperial messengers had the right of way, they were still limited to the speed a horse could maintain and the whims of the sea with its storms. Communications of orders, reports, tax revenues, new imperial directives, orders for military movements, all took time and it is one of the amazements of the Roman empire that they managed to communicate in the "quick" time that they did.
Wiki User
∙ 6y agoIn pre-mechanical transport era, communication and movement of armies was slow and difficult. So they split the Empire into four to give two emperors and two caesars more manageable quotas.
Wiki User
∙ 6y agoCommunications and transport.
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Why might the size of the Roman Empire be a problem for the Roman Empire administrative administrators?
In pre-mechanical transport era, communication and movement of armies was slow and difficult. So they split the Empire into four to give two emperors and two caesars more manageable quotas.
How do you think the division of the empire might have hastened Rome's decline?
no the division of the roman empire was so that the empire could be easier to govern and so it wasn't the division but actually the emperors. also that is why the Byzantine empire lasted longer.
Why might the size of roman empire be a problem for roman administrator?
Communication was one big problem. Even though the Romans had good roads and a signal system, it still could take days or sometimes weeks for a message to get from a province to Rome. And more time for the reply to get back to the province. Another problem was the various conditions in different parts of the empire. A law, that worked in Rome, for example, might not be reasonable or even enforceable in a place like Thrace or Dacia.
What message might these frequent and violent changes in leadership have sent to people outside the roman empire?
That the political system was broken and the Empire was no longer strong and cohesive enough to resist takeover by Eurasian peoples moving in.
Why do people have different views about the roman empire?
The Roman Empire was a large, historically influential empire that lasted for about a thousand years (longer, if we include the Eastern Roman Empire, or the subsequent Holy Roman Empire) and it did many different things, some good, and some bad, and some which might have been either good or bad, depending upon how you look at them. In other words, it is a complicated subject. It is therefore understandable that people have different views about it.
Why might the size of the Roman Empire be a problem for the Roman Empire administrative administrators?
In pre-mechanical transport era, communication and movement of armies was slow and difficult. So they split the Empire into four to give two emperors and two caesars more manageable quotas.
Why might the size of the Roman Empire be a problem for Roman administrators governors and government officials?
In pre-mechanical transport era, communication and movement of armies was slow and difficult. So they split the Empire into four to give two emperors and two caesars more manageable quotas.
Why might the size of the roman empire be a problem for the Romans administrators?
Communications and transport.
How do you think the division of the empire might have hastened Rome's decline?
no the division of the roman empire was so that the empire could be easier to govern and so it wasn't the division but actually the emperors. also that is why the Byzantine empire lasted longer.
Which emperor was assassinated by his advisers?
Many Roman emperors were afraid that they might assassinated. Many emperors were actually assassinated.
What did a Roman emperor do?
hope this helps: The roman emperor lead the country and took contol in making the difficult decisions. they helped keep the the country in order. They made laws and kept the country at peace.
How many Roman emperors were there?
All Roman Emperors were famous in their own way. There were 192 people who claimed the title Emperor of Rome from 27 BC when the Emperor Augustus took control of the Senate until 1185 AD. Some of the later such would now be called Byzantine Emperors, but a the time they called themselves Roman Emperors. Second answer. Generally speaking most historians separate the ancient Roman empire and the Byzantine empire. The Byzantine empire lasted until 1453 AD when the Ottoman Turks took over Constantinople.
Why was Charlemagne not truly the Emperor of the Romans?
Historically, we call people emperors of the Roman Empire if the Roman Senate endorsed them as such, or if an emperor approved by the Senate did so, making them co-emperors, and they subsequently ruled on their own. Anyone else who claimed independently to be the emperor is considered a claimant or usurper. The last known act of the Senate of the West Roman Empire took place in the year 603 AD, 197 years before Charlemagne was crowned emperor. He might be considered a legitimate Roman Emperor, if he had been accepted by Empress Irene of the Byzantine Empire, which was what remained of the Roman Empire at the time. From a certain point of view, all this is nonsense. If the Holy Roman Empire were still operating, our position on whether Charlemagne was legally Emperor of the Romans would almost certainly be different. There are links below.
Why might the size of the roman empire be a problem for the roman empire?
Communications were a big problem with the size of the Roman empire. It could take a couple or three weeks for a message to get from Rome to, say, Alexandria. While the Roman roads made communications good in Italy and the continent, many cities had to be reached by roads and ships. Traveling by ship was slow and time consuming. There was also the problem of tax revenue from the provinces. Because of some of the long distances, many times part of the revenue "disappeared" in transit. Manpower for the army to defend the empire was also a problem which had to be dealt with by incorporating provincials into the army.
Why might the size of roman empire be a problem for roman administrations?
Communication was one big problem. Even though the Romans had good roads and a signal system, it still could take days or sometimes weeks for a message to get from a province to Rome. And more time for the reply to get back to the province. Another problem was the various conditions in different parts of the empire. A law, that worked in Rome, for example, might not be reasonable or even enforceable in a place like Thrace or Dacia.
Why might the size of the Roman Empire be a problem for Roman administrator's?
Communication was one big problem. Even though the Romans had good roads and a signal system, it still could take days or sometimes weeks for a message to get from a province to Rome. And more time for the reply to get back to the province. Another problem was the various conditions in different parts of the empire. A law, that worked in Rome, for example, might not be reasonable or even enforceable in a place like Thrace or Dacia.
Why might the size of roman empire be a problem for roman administrator?
Communication was one big problem. Even though the Romans had good roads and a signal system, it still could take days or sometimes weeks for a message to get from a province to Rome. And more time for the reply to get back to the province. Another problem was the various conditions in different parts of the empire. A law, that worked in Rome, for example, might not be reasonable or even enforceable in a place like Thrace or Dacia.
