Because he thought that it would unbalance the north and the south
against
ignored Texas
The Westward expansion was very important during the election of 1844, because sectionalism was continuing to grow in the country. While Henry Clay objected to the annexation of Texas, his opponent, James Polk supported it, and won the election as a result.
Stephen Douglass (Democrat) and Henry Clay (Whig).
Henry clay put it together
Democrat James K. Polk defeated Whig Henry Clay in a close contest turning on the controversial issues of the annexation of the Republic of Texas.
Clay and Van Buren tried to not take a stand on the annexation of Texas because they didn't want to jeopardize their chance for being presidential candidate for their party.
Answer: Polk believed that taking over Texas would promote peace because it would mean there would be no more disputes between Texas and the other states. And the annexation (taking over) of Texas would mean that Texas would not join a foreign nation that may cause harm to the U.S.
against
The most important issue in the election of 1844 was the question of the Texas annexation. The candidate of Whig party, Henry Clay, was against the annexation for the time in being and wrote a letter to the general public explaining his position. In so doing he provoked a growing groundswell of pro-annexation feeling, especially in the South, which allowed the Democratic Party's candidate Polk in raising consensus towards his pro-annexation programme. The keynote of the Democratic campaign was therefore based on exploiting the public mind excitement to erode and overturn the margin of consensus, which at the beginning of the campaign was in favour of Henry Clay.
In 1844 he ran against James K. Polk , an avowed expansionist. Earlier Clay had publicly opposed the annexation of Texas, and he restated his position in the "Alabama letters," agreeing to annexation if it could be accomplished with the common consent of the Union and without war. This maneuver probably lost him New York state, with which he could have won the election. His failure was crushing for him and for the Whig party. In 1848 his party refused him its nomination, feeling that he had no chance, and his presidential aspirations were never fulfilled.
Henry Clay.
ignored Texas
Henry Clay and Andrew Jackson ;-)
He argued that they were against the constitution.
The Westward expansion was very important during the election of 1844, because sectionalism was continuing to grow in the country. While Henry Clay objected to the annexation of Texas, his opponent, James Polk supported it, and won the election as a result.
It was Henry Clay who earned the nickname The Great Compromiser. Clay served as the United States Senator from Kentucky from 1849 to 1852.