0
Why was Union Major General Joesph Hooker a good choice to replace Major General Burnside as commander of the Army of the Potomac?
ChuckSiata
Union General Joseph Hooker had replaced General Burnside as commander of the Army of the Potomac. His first operation in early April of 1863 was to take the offensive against General Lee. Hooker intended to outflank Lee, reach the rear of Lee's army and force Lee to take the tactical offensive to save his army from disaster. Lee had always preferred taking the tactical defensive, especially when he was outnumbered. He dis this at the Battle of Antietam in 1862.
Wiki User
∙ 7y ago
Wiki User
∙ 6y agoAfter the Union's disaster at the Battle of Frederickburg late in 1862, President Lincoln replaced General Burnside with one of his subordinates, Joseph Hooker. Hooker had been a capable corps commander and actively sought Burnside's position. He was generally considered to be a tough leader and was popular with the enlisted men and the Union officers. Hooker is given credit for rebuilding the morale of the Army of the Potomac's morale after the horrible defeat at Fredericksburg. Hooker also reformed the commissary and quartermaster services. With that said, the renewed Army of the Potomac was ready to engage the recognized power of General Lee's Army of Northern Virginia.
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
When was general Burnside put in overall command of Union forces?
After the battle of Antietam, Lincoln decided to replace General McClellan as the top military commander with general Ambrose E. Burnside. On November 3rd of 1862, Lincoln made this important change in the Union's military forces.
Who did Lincoln replace George b McClellan with?
On March 11, 1862, Lincoln relieved McClellan as General-in-Chief and took direct command of the Union armies. On November 2, 1862, Lincoln named Ambrose E. Burnside as Commander of the Army of the Potomac, replacing McClellan.
Why did General Lee expect to see the Union's plans set by General McClellan change under General Burnside?
Once General George B. McClellan was replaced by General Ambrose Burnside, it was clear to General Lee that McClellan's plans for cutting off Lee from Richmond would be altered.President Lincoln had hand picked Ambrose Burnside to replace McClellan as the commander of the Army of the Potomac. Since Lincoln was focused on the capture of Richmond, more than anything else, Burnside would follow Lincoln's preference to attack the Rebel cap[ital of Richmond. Burnside as Lee predicted shifted the Army of the Potomac to the favorite overland route to Richmond, with Fredericksburg as his first objective. Burnside planned to prevent Lee from moving south to protect Richmond.
Who won the US Civil War Battle of Fort Macon?
The Confederate Fort Macon was located on the coast of North Carolina. The fort became a target for Union artillery from March 23 to April 26, 1862. The fort surrendered on the latter date and helped Union General Burnside secure more Southern forts. Later on, it would be General Ambrose Burnside to replace George B. McClellan as commander of the Army of the Potomac.
Which two battles did Ambrose Burnside command a Union army?
Union General Ambrose Burnside had an active role in the US Civil War. His two most notable actions were in the Eastern theater. He was in command of the IX Corps at the Battle of Antietam and played a major role there. At the time the IX Corps was one of the armies of the Army of the Potomac. There Burnside reported to General George B. McClellan.Not long after Antietam, General Burnside finally accepted, on the third attempt by US President Lincoln to take command of the Army of the Potomac. Burnside had been reluctant to replace McClellan, because of his loyalty to McClellan. Also, he may have believed he was not ready to take full charge of the Union's premier army, The Army of the Potomac. Nevertheless he became in charge on this army. His second major battle came quickly near the end of 1862 in Virginia. He decided to challenge Confederate General Robert E. Lee, the head of the South's premier army, the Army of Northern Virginia. At the Battle of Fredericksburg, Burnside, via telegraph connection to President Lincoln, Burnside commanded a large number of assaults against entrenched forces of Lee. Burnside's troops face not only rifle fire but also artillery fire. The results were a disaster for Burnside and the Army of the Potomac. His repeated assaults against dug in Southern forces created a terrible amount of losses for Burnside's army. It should be noted that before Antietam, Burnside was successful in a landing on the Southern's east coast. There he too was reporting to McClellan. Also, after he was replaced as commander of the Army of the Potomac, he was instrumental in Union operations in the Western Theater.
When was general Burnside put in overall command of Union forces?
After the battle of Antietam, Lincoln decided to replace General McClellan as the top military commander with general Ambrose E. Burnside. On November 3rd of 1862, Lincoln made this important change in the Union's military forces.
Who did Lincoln replace George b McClellan with?
On March 11, 1862, Lincoln relieved McClellan as General-in-Chief and took direct command of the Union armies. On November 2, 1862, Lincoln named Ambrose E. Burnside as Commander of the Army of the Potomac, replacing McClellan.
How many times did Union General Burnside receive requests from President Lincoln to take command of the Army of the Potomac?
President Lincoln had great faith in the abilities of General Ambrose Burnside. Three times he asked Burnside to take command of the Army of the Potomac. If he agreed, then Lincoln would dismiss McClellan and replace him with Burnside. On the third request Burnside accepted. McClellan was informed on November 7, 1862 that he was dismissed.
Why did General Lee expect to see the Union's plans set by General McClellan change under General Burnside?
Once General George B. McClellan was replaced by General Ambrose Burnside, it was clear to General Lee that McClellan's plans for cutting off Lee from Richmond would be altered.President Lincoln had hand picked Ambrose Burnside to replace McClellan as the commander of the Army of the Potomac. Since Lincoln was focused on the capture of Richmond, more than anything else, Burnside would follow Lincoln's preference to attack the Rebel cap[ital of Richmond. Burnside as Lee predicted shifted the Army of the Potomac to the favorite overland route to Richmond, with Fredericksburg as his first objective. Burnside planned to prevent Lee from moving south to protect Richmond.
Who did Lincoln replace after a poorly planned attack on Fredericksburg?
After the poorly planned attack on Fredericksburg during the American Civil War, President Abraham Lincoln replaced Union General Ambrose Burnside as the commander of the Army of the Potomac. Burnside's failed strategy and high casualties led to the decision to find a new leader for the Union forces.
Who won the US Civil War Battle of Fort Macon?
The Confederate Fort Macon was located on the coast of North Carolina. The fort became a target for Union artillery from March 23 to April 26, 1862. The fort surrendered on the latter date and helped Union General Burnside secure more Southern forts. Later on, it would be General Ambrose Burnside to replace George B. McClellan as commander of the Army of the Potomac.
What general did Ambrose Burnside replace?
George McClellan
Which two battles did Ambrose Burnside command a Union army?
Union General Ambrose Burnside had an active role in the US Civil War. His two most notable actions were in the Eastern theater. He was in command of the IX Corps at the Battle of Antietam and played a major role there. At the time the IX Corps was one of the armies of the Army of the Potomac. There Burnside reported to General George B. McClellan.Not long after Antietam, General Burnside finally accepted, on the third attempt by US President Lincoln to take command of the Army of the Potomac. Burnside had been reluctant to replace McClellan, because of his loyalty to McClellan. Also, he may have believed he was not ready to take full charge of the Union's premier army, The Army of the Potomac. Nevertheless he became in charge on this army. His second major battle came quickly near the end of 1862 in Virginia. He decided to challenge Confederate General Robert E. Lee, the head of the South's premier army, the Army of Northern Virginia. At the Battle of Fredericksburg, Burnside, via telegraph connection to President Lincoln, Burnside commanded a large number of assaults against entrenched forces of Lee. Burnside's troops face not only rifle fire but also artillery fire. The results were a disaster for Burnside and the Army of the Potomac. His repeated assaults against dug in Southern forces created a terrible amount of losses for Burnside's army. It should be noted that before Antietam, Burnside was successful in a landing on the Southern's east coast. There he too was reporting to McClellan. Also, after he was replaced as commander of the Army of the Potomac, he was instrumental in Union operations in the Western Theater.
Whondid George g Meade replace in the battle of Gettysburg?
Meade replaced Hooker as the commander of the Army of the Potomac.
What caused President Lincoln to chose General Burnside over General Hooker to lead the Army of the Potomac?
President Lincoln wanted to make a careful choice on which general would replace General George B. McClellan to lead the Union's high profile army, the Army of the Potomac. He narrowed his choices down to General Ambrose E. Burnside and "Fighting" Joe Hooker. Both men had served well in the war's early battles and both had served in the Mexican War. Burnside was ten years younger than Hooker, however, that was not a key element in Lincoln's decision. Of the two, Hooker was well known to have been critical of General McClellan. On the other hand, Burnside had been a friend of McClellan's and they knew each other from their time at West Point. Lincoln knew all too well the fierce loyalty the Army of the Potomac's officers and soldiers had towards McClellan, and Lincoln did not want to hrt the morale of the troops by appointing someone that had been an outspoken critic of McClellan. Lincoln chose Burnside, but was surprised that Burnside turned down the offer twice. It seems that it was exactly because of Burnside's friendship with McClellan, he did not wish to "betray" his friend and seem to be Lincoln's replacement for a man the rank and file of the army held in such high esteem. Finally, on Lincoln's third request, Burnside placed the nation's need for a good general above his own personal loyalty to McClellan, and accepted the job.
Who recommended that Major General George G. Meade take command of the Army of the Potomac in 1863?
In late June of 1863, President Lincoln became dissatisfied with General Hooker's plans to challenge General Robert E. Lee's advance into Pennsylvania. He relieved Hooker and took the advice of General in Chief Halleck's advice to replace Hooker with Major General George G. Meade. Meade had been a corps commander with the Army of the Potomac.
Who did general burnside replace in the union army?
In November of 1862, Predident Lincoln replaced General George McClellan with General Ambrose Burnside. This was due in part for McCellan's failure to allow General Lee's Army of Northern Virginia to withdraw without pursuit from the Battle of Antietam. This was soon followed by the Battle of Fredricksburg.
