Grant was very different from McClellan. They were both excellent in different fields, but Grant was more effective...
McClellan was an excellent planner and had much experience on the battlefield, the problem was that he wasn't a very good leader. He wasn't good at making decisions in a fast-paced battlefield, and often kept many soldiers to doing nothing at very important points of the war. Although McClellan had kept the Union's morale in tip-top shape, they hadn't been doing to good in the war, especially a huge failed attack to seize Richmond, Virginia. Lincoln did not approve of McClellan, and he was out of the major general position after a brief term (November 1861 to March 1862).
Now lets move on to Ulysses S. Grant (18th President of the United States)...
As many people know, Grant was the last general Lincoln hired and won the Civil War against Robert E. Lee's stellar South. Unlike McClellan, Grant was an aggressive general and seized key points like Kentucky, Tennessee, and the Mississippi River. Grant was a fast-paced general that was definitely needed for the Civil War. The battle that won it all was when Grant's Union army captured Richmond (the Confederacy capital) in April 1865... the final blow for the Confederate army...
So yes, Grant was a very effective general. After a series of different generals, Lincoln had found the perfect one!
McClellan was better at building an army(training,drilling etc.) than he was at field command(actually using the army in battle). He was often overestimating the numbers of Confederate troops opposing him and he regularly called for more troops to be sent to him when he already had superior numbers.
Guns would be more effective than other devises, right?
McClellan was a Major General ("two star general"). The Yankees had no one of higher rank than two stars, on the grounds that Washington had been a three star general, and nobody was as good as Washington, until Lincoln promoted Grant to three stars in 1864, so there would be no question that Grant outranked everybody and was in command. Grant was the only three star officer for the north - he was THE Lieutenant General. The south had 30 or so three stars and eight four stars.
The answer is John Bankhead Magruder. Magruder accomplished this through the use of quaker guns - wodden logs carved to resemble cannons - shifting his real artillery from position to position and firing them frequently and liberally - to give the impression of there being more artillery in place than there actually was - and by marching small groups of his command past across the same positions numerous times - to give the impression of there being more men in position than there actually were.
grant plan was very smart and they toke time to think what was going to happen so that's why they win
He had credibility, where others had forfeited theirs. Grant had liberated the Mississippi, and then saved the Army of the Cumberland from starvation in Chattanooga. When some of the cabinet were agitating for Grant's removal, Lincoln said "I can't spare this man. He fights."
Why are I-message more effective than you-message
Army Generals are NOT elected. They are appointed, with the consent of the Senate, by the President, as Commander-In-Chief of the US Armed Forces. Lincoln had appointed General George Mcclellan as Commander of the Union Army, but replaced him when little success was achieved in fighting the Civil War.
There are more than one. Clairesse McClellan and Mildred Montag come to mind for me.
There are some decisions that are more effective if made by a group. Other decisions are more effective if made by individuals.
Conjunctivitis tobramycin is more effective than gentamicin for a cat.
The fruit that is more effective at keeping people awake in the morning than caffine!
Pray. It's much more effective than searching the internet.
No
yes
We are not sure what you mean by effective, but if you mean "effective in killing you," the answer is yes.
Cycles are more effective than walking for the same period of time, though treadmills can be adjusted for inclines, which make them significantly more demanding.