It wasn't. But it still was valuable in a sense because salt provided the best-known food preservative at the time, especially for meat, allowing there was no refrigeration.
It is widely, though incorrectly, believed that troops in the Roman army were paid in salt. Even widely-respected historical works repeat this error.
Ancient Rome developed the second largest empire antiquity was. It included Greece.
You need to be more specific. it is not clear what you mean by how they are.
ancient rome had priests for its polytheistic religions. christian priests were more common when constatine the great made Christianity the official language of rome.
You could loosely say that Italy is the country that takes the place of ancient Rome simply because Rome is located there, but with reservations. Ancient Rome was an empire encompassing much more territory than present day Italy. In reality there is no modern country that can even compare with ancient Rome.
Patrician was a social class in ancient Rome. It was simply the name of a class, nothing more.Patrician was a social class in ancient Rome. It was simply the name of a class, nothing more.Patrician was a social class in ancient Rome. It was simply the name of a class, nothing more.Patrician was a social class in ancient Rome. It was simply the name of a class, nothing more.Patrician was a social class in ancient Rome. It was simply the name of a class, nothing more.Patrician was a social class in ancient Rome. It was simply the name of a class, nothing more.Patrician was a social class in ancient Rome. It was simply the name of a class, nothing more.Patrician was a social class in ancient Rome. It was simply the name of a class, nothing more.Patrician was a social class in ancient Rome. It was simply the name of a class, nothing more.
No. They are just more valuable coins. These are the coins from least valuable to most valuable: yellow, red, blue.
Ancient Rome was more sucessful.
Because Ancient Greece did have the same technology as Ancient Rome as Ancient Rome were technologically advanced. Ancient Rome had a stronger army and a more stronger and structured democracy.
No they are not, in general just because a coin has a mintmark does not make it more valuable.
I would say Ancient China, because there is no actual known philosopher from Ancient Rome
Ancient Rome developed the second largest empire antiquity was. It included Greece.
I think you need to be way more specific. "Ancient Rome" could be classed from its founding in 753BC to the fall of Rome in 476AD.
You need to be more specific. it is not clear what you mean by how they are.
ancient rome had priests for its polytheistic religions. christian priests were more common when constatine the great made Christianity the official language of rome.
7.5 pounds of cotten It's close to impossible to compare ancient prices with today's prices because of the value of the coins. Ancient coins had a standard amount of pure silver/gold in them, making them, in some cases, more valuable than any denomination of ours. In other word, a few Roman coins would buy much more than today's dollars.
Please be more specific. What do you want to know about he ancient literature?
They are not valuable, they are still in circulation and are worth 50 Pence. Newer coins only have some value if they are in mint uncirculated condition or, if they are Proof coins. Due to the extra work put into them and the metals they are made from, Proof coins are more expensive to buy in the first place.