The South had its one big commodity, cotton. And the cotton trade depended on slave-labour.
The North was becoming rapidly industrialised, and factory-bosses couldn't use slaves. They depended on the free movement of skilled labour.
Slavery was more important to the South than it was to the North, because the South's economy relied on agriculture.
The South had more than the North, and the abolishment of slavery began in the North. But the South wanted slaves - thus ensued the Civil War.
Harriet Tubman
More people, more industry, a navy, President Abraham Lincoln had greater power than President Jefferson Davis. Also the North was fighting to end slavery once and for all. The South was fighting to preserve slavery. England and France, (which had outlawed slavery a long time before the USA Civil War) were never going to help the South win the war to preserve slavery.
Because they wanted to people to work for them so that the slave owners wouldn't have to do the work!Slavery was important to their economy. The South was mostly agrarian and the needed workers. As it turned out slavery was more expensive than hiring freemen to work the plantations. Slaveholders had to care for their slave into old age. which cost more than simply hiring able bodied men. It is kind of like our socisl welfare system today. We are one big plantation.
Slavery was more important to the South than it was to the North, because the South's economy relied on agriculture.
There was some slavery, for a time, in the North, but there were more crops in the South than in the North, e.g. less need in the north.
because the south was more agriculturally focused, where as the north was driven by manufacturing.
Slavery was less successful in the north due to the fact that the north was more of a merchant society than the south was. Slavery was more "necessary" in the south because of the vast amount of farmland that was present in the south. The north however, relied more on trading/
Slavery became more widespread in the South due to the region's reliance on agriculture, particularly cash crops like cotton, tobacco, and sugar that required intensive labor. The warm climate and longer growing seasons in the South also made it more conducive to large-scale farming operations that used enslaved labor. In contrast, the North had a more diverse economy with more emphasis on industry and commerce, which did not rely as heavily on slave labor.
Slavery during the Civil War in the United States was prominent in the Southern. The Confederate states in the South were in favor of slavery while the Union states in the North were opposed to slavery.
Harriet Tubman
The South Lost the war, and the economy of the South was built on Slavery which came to an end as a result of the war.
Slavery disappeared in the north because they used more factories and they were based on industry rather than agriculture like in the south
The South had more than the North, and the abolishment of slavery began in the North. But the South wanted slaves - thus ensued the Civil War.
The south treated their slaves much more fairly than the deep southern states. (South example: North Carolina) (Deep South example: Georgia, South Carolina) Maryland treated their slave fairly, and they were considered a northern state.
No, not like the south. It was an economic slavery where people were paid very little and treated poorly. African Americans still didn't have rights but were more free than their counterparts in the south.