answersLogoWhite

0


Want this question answered?

Be notified when an answer is posted

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Why was slavery important to the econmy in the south before the civil war?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Continue Learning about Economics

Was slavery important to economic growth in the US?

it was the southern lifestyle and they enjoyed it since they had people working for them. that led to the Civil War and at the time when slavery was becoming a problem America had states, not colonies.


What were 5 political social and economic issues that were associated with the civil war?

Secession- where they thought of their state before their country. Slavery. states' rights. sectionalism. election of 1860.


What did the north have an economy based on before the civil war?

The north had an economy based on Manufacturing this made northerners oppose slavery because slaves could have taken their jobs


What was the new labor system that developed in the south after the civil war that kept most freedmen economically?

Sharecropping was the main labor system in the South after the Civil War. It seemed like a fair idea, but it ended up very similar to slavery. It would keep the laborer in constant debt.


Why would the ending of slavery hurt the southern economy?

In the time period before the US Civil War, the years between 1800 & 1860, as an example, ending slavery all at once would have disrupted the economy of the South. The slave workers who were not paid, would be freed slave or Southern farmhands who would have had to be paid. It's clear that such a large disruption would adversely affect a large portion of the large plantations growing cotton and tobacco. A more logical way would be to as rapidly as possible, create a step by step elimination of slavery based on a system that would do the most good without extending slavery too long in the USA. Lincoln looked at the method the British used in eliminating slavery in the West Indies. There slave owners were compensated by the government in order to make the transition more feasible. Based on the $multi million cost of the Civil War on both sides, compensating slave owners would most certainly be less than the cost of the War. This does even speak about the loss of life & limbs that no cost can be attached to.