The Bill of Rights was added to the American Constitution almost immediately after the Constitution itself was ratified because of the intention of the Constitution's writers to clarify the document's contents. As the Constitution's writers themselves recognized, the Constitution was intended to be a foundational document: its continued relevance would depend on further clarifications as the nation developed over time, with the Bill of Rights serving as the initial effort in this direction.
Second thoughts, and acknowledgment of the concerns of various parties who felt the Constitution was imperfect, but did not want to delay its ratification any longer. duhh
The Bill of Rights was a way for the Anti-Federalists (those who opposed a strong, central federal government and wanted a strong state government) to ensure that the federal government would not enfringe upon the personal rights of Americans. However, it did not provide any protection against state governments. In fact, the Bill of Rights did NOT apply to state laws until the 14th amendment was added.
During the Constitutional Convention George Mason urged the other delegates to include a Bill of Rights guaranteeing everyone their basic natural rights. The delegates chose to ignore him. Now, after the Constitution was sent out for ratification it came to their attention that many of those who opposed the Constitution did so on the basis of there was no Bill of Rights. The opponents argued that this new Constitution did not guarantee them any rights and would lead tyranny. You could call it an attempt to cover their mistake and convince people that they were the good guys.
Which Anti-Federalist concern does this amendment included in the Bill of Rights most clearly address? A. The importance of free expression of opinions that oppose the government B. The value of electing representatives who depend on the people for their power C. The fear that a strong centralized government could use military to take away citizens ' rights O D. The need for strong state governments to balance the powerful federal government
The Bill of Rights is the first 10 amendments to the Constitution. They were added AFTER the ratification of the document by the first Congress.
The Bill of Rights was added to the Constitution as the first ten amendments on December 15, 1791. The fact that the Constitution did not include a bill of rights to specifically protect Americans' hard-won rights sparked the most heated debates during the ratification process.
bill of rights
Yes, originally people didn't want to ratify the constitution because it didn't have a list of rights for American citizens. So they added the first ten amendments: The bill of rights.
The major argument was the absence of a bill of rights in the Constitution
It was added as a compromise between those that supported ratification of the Constitution, called Federalists, and those that were opposed to ratification, called Anti-federalists. Anti-federalists agreed to support ratification of the Constitution if the Bill of Rights was added later, which is why the Bill of Rights is the first 10 amendments to the Constitution.
Bill of rights
There was a point in the drafting process when the United States Constitution did not include a Bill of Rights, which was the primary sticking point in terms of ratification. A Bill of Rights did get added.
The Bill of Rights was added to the Constitution. The purpose and meaning of the Bill of Rights as it emerged from the ratification process, was to preserve the liberties England's revolution laws threatened.
The constitution has been amended a total of 27 times. Of those, 17 were added after the Bill of Rights.
The Bill of Rights is the first 10 amendments to the Constitution. They were added AFTER the ratification of the document by the first Congress.
Wezzles Says: bill of rights
the Bill of Rights
The Bill of Rights was added to the Constitution as the first ten amendments on December 15, 1791. The fact that the Constitution did not include a bill of rights to specifically protect Americans' hard-won rights sparked the most heated debates during the ratification process.
In 1789 during the ratification process, the Constitution did not include a Bill of Rights.
the bill of rights was added to coax the anti federalists, or jeffersonians. they needed just one more state to ratify the constitution so they decided that a bill of rights was a good request to accept.
They added the Bill of Rights, because the ratification process made it clear that the people wanted a list of rights incorporated into the document.