During the Renaissance, as during the Middle Ages and for several centuries to follow, the Church was one of the most powerful social and political forces in Europe because of both its wealth and its inherent authority. Even without a standing military of substance (although it could and did call upon the military power of independent nations at times), the Church was recognized by most Europeans as a God-given force with special responsibilities and privileges in this world.
They became so powerful as wealthy people gave money and possessions to the church in hope that they would be sent to heaven .
I really don't believe there were more scientific advances during the Renaissance than during the Middle Ages. To check this impression, I looked at the lists of technologies of the two periods in Wikipedia. The inventions listed as being of the Middle Ages seem more important and certainly far outnumber those of the Renaissance. There are links below to the articles I consulted for this. I should note that most historians have the Middle Ages and Renaissance overlap to some degree, so the printing press and the blast furnace are claimed by both. I think there is an issue of perception here. The Church never objected much to scientific advancements of the Middle Ages, so we have no special reason to remember them. There was no special theological problem with the invention of the horse collar or stirrups, and the wheel barrow could hardly have been considered a threat to the Church. Gunpowder and cannons were new, as were combined arms tactics and massed archers, but the Church was more or less neutral on weapons. Clocks and wine presses were of little interest to popes. And the introduction of chimneys and fireplaces, on the one hand, and spectacles, on the other, could only have been welcomed by old men of the Church. The problem that arose during the Renaissance was one of advances such as those in astronomy, which says something about cosmology, and this, in turn is an object of focus of attention. If there are moons around Jupiter, then there might be life, souls, on Jupiter, requiring their own encounter with God and Saviour. This meant that the Catholic Church might not be actually the only true universal religion. A heresy could be hushed up, as many were during the Middle Ages, but the printing press had come along, so the leaders of the Church felt a need to act quickly in a way they had not needed to do before. Also, the writers in of the Renaissance regarded themselves as superior to those of the Middle Ages, who were unable to defend themselves in a debate that started after they had died. Our historians have tended to buy the Renaissance point of view uncritically, from time to time.
the renaissance in general europe was from circa 14th to 17th century. so technically yes. if it is the italian renaissance that you are referring to however, then no. james ii, james iv and james v would be the only ones.
Here is a quick answer. The middle ages was different from the renaissance because the renaissance was basicly a time when the arts music and science reawakened and had some advances to it. People were more interested about art, music, literature, and science in the renaissance. During the middle ages it was not as important to the people, so when the renaissance came the arts were kind of reintroduced to the people. The renaissance lasted from about 1300 to 1600.
Bumpy Johnson was alive and in Harlem during the Harlem Renaissance years. BUT he did not contribute to the rebirth of African American Culture through the arts, music and literature. So, he was "around" it but not "in" it.
The Renaissance was ruled by kings and the Church so individual freedoms were not available for people. Powerful people sponsored the art and buildings of the time.
During the Renaissance, Italy consisted of a large number of small states, usually city state, with all sorts of governments, so by the Church, some by nobility, and some run by republican governments. Wealthy merchant and banking families such as the Medicis were particularly powerful.
shakespear was famous becaue it was considered a crime to paint any painting that the church did not like.
Shakespeare lived during the Renaissance, so everyone he knew, he knew during the renaissance.
There are no words during the renaissance that i can think of and i really need it, so, ya srry.
Florence became a major city during the renaissance because the Medici family, who was very rich and powerful at the time, sponsored many artists and without them they wouldn't have been able to create and sell so much work.
He was in 1492 and it began middle 1400's. So he was in the late Renaissance.
Because there was no TV or cinema.
Because the church had more money than the king (henry the 8th )
Florence during the Renaissance was a hub of intellectual, artistic, and financial activity, fostering an environment that encouraged innovation and creativity. The city's wealthy and powerful Medici family played a significant role in patronizing artists and scholars, supporting their work and contributing to the flourishing of talent in Florence. Additionally, the city's cultural exchange with other regions and the revival of classical learning during this period also contributed to the emergence of many great Renaissance figures in Florence.
because the church was powerful.
Well, he was born during the Renaissance times so he was a part of it by default.The Renaissance is the name for the 1400s and part of the 1500s, the time when Leonardo lived.