When writing the US Constitution, the New Jersey plan for the US legislature would have given each state equal representation without regard to population. This would give greater influence to citizens of the less populous states than a legislature apportioned by population (both houses under the Virginia Plan). Under the Connecticut Compromise (The Great Compromise), states have equal representation in the Senate but apportioned representation in the House of Representatives.
*The unicameral plan previously used under the Articles of Confederation gave each state one vote in the legislature, which proved extremely problematic in practice.
smaller ones
The New Jersey plan stated that the larger states should have the most representation. This worried the smaller states that they would not be heard as much.
The New Jersey plan
Because James Madison likes Small Things, and the new jersey plan focused on giving the smaller states equal power to the larger and more populated.
larger states
the sdr plane was the smaller size in worl
The New Jersey Plan did not work because it benefited smaller states
The New Jersey Plan, which advocated for equal representation for each state in Congress regardless of population size, would likely garner support from smaller states. States such as Delaware, Vermont, and Wyoming, which have smaller populations and thus would benefit from equal representation, would be inclined to support this plan. Additionally, other states with concerns about being overshadowed by larger states, like Rhode Island and South Dakota, might also favor the New Jersey Plan.
The bigger states opposed the New Jersey plan and the smaller states opposed the Virginia plan. IDK which states liked/dislike the great compromise.
unequal representation of smaller states
Virginia Plan and New Jersey Plan
Jersey plan