0
Why were slaves in Virginia better off than those in the cCaribbean?
Wiki User
∙ 9y ago
Slaves in Virginia were often allowed to marry, own property, and had some legal protections that were not provided to slaves in the Caribbean. Additionally, there were more opportunities for social and cultural exchange in Virginia due to the larger population of free people of color. The climate and working conditions were also generally less harsh in Virginia compared to the plantations in the Caribbean.
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Why were slaves in Virginia better off than those in Caribbean?
There was enough land to grow food as well as cash crops Slaves in Virginia were better off than slaves in the Caribbean because there was enough land to grow food as well as cash crops. Therefore, the slaves had more to eat.
Why were slaves in Virginia better off then those in the Caribbean?
Slaves in Virginia were often better off than those in the Caribbean due to factors such as having more stable family structures, being less likely to be subjected to harsh labor conditions in sugar plantations, and having better access to health care and nutrition. Additionally, some slaves in Virginia had the opportunity for education and gained skills that allowed them to work in more diverse occupations.
Why were slaves in Virginia better off than those in carribean?
Slaves in Virginia had lower mortality rates due to less harsh working conditions and better access to healthcare. They also had more opportunities for social mobility and potential manumission. Additionally, families were often kept intact, providing a sense of stability and community among slaves in Virginia.
Why were slaves in virgini better off than those in the Caribbean?
Slaves in Virginia were generally better off than those in the Caribbean due to factors such as lower disease rates, longer life expectancy, and opportunities for familial connections. The climate in Virginia was milder, reducing the spread of tropical diseases, and some slaves had the opportunity to work on small farms where they had more autonomy and contact with their families. Additionally, the legal system in Virginia provided certain protections for slaves that were not always present in the Caribbean.
Why were the slaves in Virginia better off than those of Caribbean?
Slaves in Virginia were often better off than those in the Caribbean due to factors such as lower rates of tropical diseases, higher life expectancy, and more opportunities for family stability. Additionally, the distance from the harsh tropical climate allowed for better living conditions and potentially less brutal working conditions.
Why were slaves n Virginia better off than those in the Caribbean?
Slaves in Virginia were better off than slaves in the Caribbean because there was enough land to grow food as well as cash crops. Therefore, the slaves had more to eat.
Which statement explains why slaves in Virginia were better off than those in the Caribbean?
Slaves in Virginia were typically better off than those in the Caribbean due to milder climate conditions, lower mortality rates, and greater possibilities for self-sufficiency through small farming plots. Additionally, the presence of extended kinship networks among enslaved communities in Virginia provided greater social support and resistance to the harsh conditions of slavery.
Why were slaves in Virginia better off than those in the caribbeans?
There was enough land to grow food as well as cash crops Slaves in Virginia were better off than slaves in the Caribbean because there was enough land to grow food as well as cash crops. Therefore, the slaves had more to eat.
Why were slaves in Virginia better off than those in Caribbean?
There was enough land to grow food as well as cash crops Slaves in Virginia were better off than slaves in the Caribbean because there was enough land to grow food as well as cash crops. Therefore, the slaves had more to eat.
Why were slaves in Virginia better off than those in the Caribbean?
There was enough land to grow food as well as cash crops Slaves in Virginia were better off than slaves in the Caribbean because there was enough land to grow food as well as cash crops. Therefore, the slaves had more to eat.
Why were the slaves in Virginia better off than those in the Caribbean?
They weren't better off. This is a fallacy and false. Slaves are people owned by other people no matter where. The white supremacist tries to show that slavery is beneficial to the slave, but this is not true.
Why were slaves in Virgina better off than those in the Caribbean?
There was enough land to grow food as well as cash crops
What was the total number of slaves freed when the Emancipation Proclamitation was ratified by all states effected?
The Emancipation Proclamation freed all American slaves except those in (1) Maryland, Delaware, Missouri , Tennessee, and Kentucky; (2) the counties of Virginia that shortly thereafter became the State of West Virginia; (3) seven other specifically-named counties of Virginia; and (4) New Orleans and 13 specifically-named nearby Louisiana parishes. These exceptions represented states and counties/parishes that were already substantially under Union control on January 1, 1863, the effective date of the Proclamation. By its terms, the Proclamation did not apply to slaves in those areas. Those slaves were freed, not by ratification of the Emancipation Proclamation, but by the adoption of the Thirteenth Amendment, which abolished slavery throughout the United States.
Do slaves from china make your clothes?
Not slaves, but those in prison.
Slaves in the Chesapeake region expanded their numbers through natural increases in birthrate yet those in South Carolina did not. What is the most likely reason for this difference?
The Chesapeake slaves lived and worked under better conditions.
Slaves in the Chesapeake region expanded their numbers through natural increases in birthrate yet those in South Carolina did not What is the most likely reason for this difference?
The Chesapeake slaves lived and worked under better conditions.
What happen to the slaves in Delaware Kentucky Maryland and Missouri?
Those states didn't have slaves.
