Trains and railroads were initially much better than canals, and they offered several advantages over existing modes of transport; they were fast, able to cross almost any terrain, and possible to operate in servere weather.
railroads were better transportation than canals
Yes subways are better than trains.
Trains can get to more places than boats.
no ther not
railroads
Trains are better for the environment - as they produce less pollution per passenger than cars do.
Yes, i believe it did as alot of the business that the canals used to have got taken away as the trains then did the carrying of cargo. This was because trains were quicker than barges.
They were quicker, as canal boats were horse-drawn. Trains could reach around 30 miles an hour. Railway tracks were also much easier to construct than canals.
Cars are better then trains because they can travel faster, and are more comfortable to travel in. NO trains are better they can go twice as fast as cars. first class or any class is better than car seating this is why: meals on board.toilets.meals.internet wifis.plugs for phones and laptop. can u get that in a car?
Once railroads were invented, there really wasn't much impetus to dig canals. Trains can go up and down hills, which is difficult and expensive to do with canals and locks. Trains are also faster.
In my opinion trains are better than planes. Trains have a better and more interesting history that dates back to the fifteenth century. Trains are better for the environment and get you to just as many places and plane's. OK, they can't get you to America but if someone invested then I bet they could get you to America, it would be a tunnel like the one from England to France, except across the Atlantic ocean and not the English channel. Some great inventors are involved with trains and trains helped with the industrial revolution. If trains had not been invented then we might not have today's thriving enterprise system. That's my opinion
Trains by a mile