0
Why would a landowner rather use slavery than indentured servants?
Wiki User
∙ 6y ago
A landowner may prefer slavery over indentured servants because slaves were considered property and were permanent, with no expiration date on their service, whereas indentured servants typically had contracts lasting for set periods of time. Slaves also did not have legal rights or the ability to negotiate terms of their labor, providing landowners with more control and stability.
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Why would a landowner rather use instead of indentured servants?
A landowner might prefer to use wage laborers instead of indentured servants because wage laborers provide more flexibility and control over the workforce. With wage laborers, the landowner can hire and fire workers as needed without being bound by the terms of a contract like with indentured servants. Additionally, wage laborers may have more experience and skills that can benefit the operations of the landowner.
Which of these is a good reason landowners would rather have slaves than indentured servants?
Landowners would prefer slaves over indentured servants because slaves were seen as a permanent source of labor without a time limit on their service, while indentured servants had contracts that ended after a specific period. Slaves were also considered property that could be bought and sold, providing the landowner with greater control. Additionally, the system of slavery was based on race and allowed for the perpetuation of wealth and power within a specific group.
Why would a landowner rather use slaves than indetured servants?
A landowner may prefer slaves over indentured servants because slaves were considered property for life, providing a long-term and potentially more cost-effective labor source compared to indentured servants who were only bound for a fixed period. Slaves were also seen as having less legal rights and were less likely to challenge their owners, giving landowners more control over their workforce.
Why would a landowner rather use slaves than than indentured?
Slaves could be counted on to be more loyal to their masters, and slaves are property and can be bought and sold. Indentured servants are contractually obligated to work for their employer for a fixed amount of time after which they can leave.
Why would a landowner rather use slaves then indentured servents?
Landowners might prefer slaves over indentured servants because slaves are considered property and can be owned for life, providing a more stable and permanent labor force. Slaves also have fewer legal protections and rights than indentured servants, giving landowners more control over their work and minimizing the risk of servants completing their terms and leaving. Additionally, the transatlantic slave trade made slaves more readily available and often cheaper to acquire than indentured servants.
Why would a landowner rather use slaves indentured servants?
Slaves could be counted on to be more loyal to their masters, and slaves are property and can be bought and sold. Indentured servants are contractually obligated to work for their employer for a fixed amount of time after which they can leave.
Why would a landowner rather use slaves than indentured servants?
Slaves could be counted on to be more loyal to their masters, and slaves are property and can be bought and sold. Indentured servants are contractually obligated to work for their employer for a fixed amount of time after which they can leave.
Why would a landowner rather use slaves than than indentured?
Slaves could be counted on to be more loyal to their masters, and slaves are property and can be bought and sold. Indentured servants are contractually obligated to work for their employer for a fixed amount of time after which they can leave.
What is a reason landowners would rather have slaves than indentured servants.?
Since slavery was for life, I slave provided more years of work. Apex
Why would owners of large plantations rather slaves than indentured servants?
Since slavery lasted a lifetime, a slave provided more years of work.
Why would owners of large plantations rather have slaves than indentured servants?
Since slavery lasted a lifetime, a slave provided more years of work.
Which of these is a good reason landowners would rather have slaves than indentured servants?
Landowners would prefer slaves over indentured servants because slaves were seen as a permanent source of labor without a time limit on their service, while indentured servants had contracts that ended after a specific period. Slaves were also considered property that could be bought and sold, providing the landowner with greater control. Additionally, the system of slavery was based on race and allowed for the perpetuation of wealth and power within a specific group.
Why would a landowner rather use slaves then indentured servents?
Landowners might prefer slaves over indentured servants because slaves are considered property and can be owned for life, providing a more stable and permanent labor force. Slaves also have fewer legal protections and rights than indentured servants, giving landowners more control over their work and minimizing the risk of servants completing their terms and leaving. Additionally, the transatlantic slave trade made slaves more readily available and often cheaper to acquire than indentured servants.
Why did colonial masters first adopt the institution of indentured servitude rather than Indian or black slavery?
Early on, there was a steady stream of white, indentured servants coming from England to the New World. Many were promised land after completing their services and were therefore eager to work. The main reason colonial masters opted for this option was because these indentured servants were much cheaper than African and Indian slaves. After Bacon's rebellion however, and after an economic upturn in England which kept laborers home, indentured servants became a less desirable option. At this point, the slave trade had opened up and indentured servants were seen as too difficult to control.
Which of these is a reason plantation owners preferred to have slaves rather then indentured servants?
Plantation owners preferred slaves over indentured servants because slaves were seen as a long-term and inheritable source of labor, providing more stability and control over their workforce. Additionally, slaves did not have the legal protections and rights that indentured servants possessed, making them easier to exploit and control. Finally, the racial hierarchy and beliefs of the time perpetuated the notion that Africans and their descendants were inferior and thus suitable for enslavement.
Why did colonists turn to slave labor rather than indentured servants in the late 1600s?
There was a decline in availability of indentured servants from England. The indentured servants from England weren't good workers. Indentured servitude was outlawed in the colonies.
Many Virginians turned to slaves rather than to indentured servants for labor because Africans?
Did not have to be released, so there was no fear that they might become an unstable, landless class.
