Artillery has more range and more destructive power.
they would have used rifles
There were many weapons used during the civil war. Many and most were guns such as rifels, Lmat revolvers, musket, carbine, grenades, gatling gun, and a revolver. Many of these weapons were very hard for newcomers, but the training would teach all the soldiers could know. Using such a dangerous weapon could sometimes pay off if you learned to load (gunpowder) and aim. They also used rocks and pebbles as well a wood if they did not have any weapons left. == ==
ALL nations that were involved in WW I used rifles. While the most common use was by Infantrymen, soldiers in all branches of the military would have reason to use rifles- whether they were artillery, Armor, Cavalry, or Supply personnel. Rifles (and handguns) were even used by pilots.
Kentucky-long rifles mostly, one shot pistols, and cannons ranging from 12pdr- an 18pdr and bob Anything available. Including Pennsylvania/Kentucky rifle, British Brown Bess muskets, British Baker Rifles, (British musket and rifles were used by both sides), the U.S. Common Rifle of 1817, trade rifles and smooth-bore muskets, French Charles ville muskets, it's known that Travis used a shotgun. Most of these weapons would have been flintlock, but by the mid 1830's, percussion locks were also starting to be seen, and some of the flintlocks could have been converted to percussion. Handguns... single shot flint and maybe also percussion. All these weapons would have been as real mix-up of calibres. Artillery, smooth bore cannon of various sizes from 3 lb shot up to 18 lb. shot
There are several ongoing wars worldwide. You would need to be a bit more specific about which one you had in mind, and you may want to limit the scope of which weapons you have in mind, as 'weapons' covers everything from small arms to field artillery to armed ground vehicles to aircraft, etc.
Trenches were the soldiers main protection from machine guns and artillery, but the British and United States alsong with other countries had special helmets to protect their heads from artillery.
Depends on what type of weapon you are asking about. Assuming you mean a shoulder fired weapon it would range anywhere from 100 yards (smooth bore musket) to 1000 yards (and in the case of some specialized rifles even more). If you talking about artillery again it would vary with type piece, size of piece and the type projectile anywhere from a few hundred yards to several miles.
The Royal Ordinance Factory, primarily. IIRC, it is now operated under contract by Heckler & Koch, GmBh. This is for small arms, and the term "weapons" is a pretty broad category, which would include tanks, antiaircraft weapons, missiles, artillery pieces, etc. SA80-Belgium
Conventional means accepted standards. Conventional weapons are normal weapons that most nations possess; warships, airplanes, artillery, tanks, Machineguns, etc. Un-Conventional Weapons are weapons that most nations do NOT possess. Nuclear Weapons would be un-conventional weapons. An un-heard of primitive weapon might be considered an un-conventional weapon. The term can also be applied to warfare itself: Un-Conventional Warfare might be guerrilla warfare; Conventional warfare would be traditional Armies fighting against another Army.
Can't find any specifics on it. Some weapons are mentioned, but not in great detail. Most likely, Enfield rifles and/or Mauser rifles were the primary weapons. Some mention of revolvers is made, and these would probably be Webley revolvers. Tom Barry's accounts of Kilmichael mentions that they used captured British weapons, so Enfields would definitely be involved. He makes no mention of any of the Mausers (which were widespread both among Republican and Loyalist factions), although that's not really definitive as to whether or not some were used.
An Artillery piece (large cannon) or gun firing a large calibre shell. When the shell landed this would be an artillery explosion.
Many chemical reactions are favored by heat.