answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

It will not show up on routine blood testing. To see it you need to do a specific test for it. The test must be taken from an artery (no the usual vein), requires special equipments, and must be run immediately and so usually can only be done at hospitals.

User Avatar

Wiki User

13y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Will carbon monoxide show in a full blood test?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

Show the combustion of a hydrocarbon?

It is when you burn Oxygen. Here are equations. Hydrocarbon + Oxygen --> Carbon Dioxide + Water Hydrocarbon + Oxygen --> Carbon Monoxide + Water


How do you treat carbon monoxide?

Nicely. Buy it some roses. Take it to an expensive restaurant. Show it a good time.


Will cancer signs show in full blood test?

They can, but it depends on the exact blood test, and what stage the cancer is at.


If you run your car hot how can you tell if you damaged your motor?

You can run a compression test, check for carbon monoxide in the coolant, ask the shaman to "throw the bones"... sometimes it doesn't matter what you do, the problem might not show up for as much as a few months. If the compression is okay and you don't have carbon monoxide in the coolant, just drive it and enjoy. Just to be clear, I don't have much confidence in the shaman.


Which show a structural formula with a triple bond?

A triple bond in chemistry is a chemical bond between two atoms involving six bonding electrons. Carbon monoxide and cyanogen are examples of the structural formula.


Will carbon monoxide show up when you have to blow in a machine and you have smoked marijuana?

no, unless you blow smoke into the machine, carbon monoxide is about as prevalent in cigarette smoke as weed smoke. What make it bad for you is it's high reactivity which also makes it not last long in your body. There aren't any breathalyzers for weed as far as I know, all the metabolites that you can test for are dilute and not volatile enough to be present in your breath as alcohol is.


What harm does carbon dioxide and carbon monoxide do?

A very valid question, and I am quite surprised this has not been answered by a ture scientist. I hope there is one who will take my comments here & shred them with facts. I hear so much about attempts to lower carbon dioxide, but I don't think that's the real issue. I believe the real issue is carbon monoxide. I did a Google search on Photosynthesis, and here is one of the basic resulting pictures: Plants naturally convert carbon dioxide in the photosynthesis process. Other living organizms, such as algae, also contribute to this effect. Now, moving on to the real beast: Carbon Monoxide What causes Carbon monoxide by % (image from a Google search) According to a public broadcast, I watched a real scientist explain how carbon monoxide levels have been monitored since the 1950's. They monitored from Hawaii, and he was clear to mention that there was never a year that had a notable decrease in carbon monoxide levels. Even though I was able to locate charts indicating reduced levels of carbon monoxide (in certain local monitored areas) I would need to agree, there is no proof of ever having a reduced monoxide level in the past 60 years. The main speaker was quite informed, and I am sorry, I am unable to reference his name. He gave a great segment on the ocean, and its natural ability to absorb carbon monoxide. The waves, at the surface level would, at one time, would absorb the carbon monoxide from the atmosphere, and these solid molecular chains would fall down through the salty water to the ocean basin, where they would begin to decompose into their natural elements, or even returning to their original fuel states. The problem, as I remember from the speech, was that the upper levels of the ocean (say 5'-15') are saturated so much with carbon monoxide, that it acts like a protective barrier for the process to start. Much like oil resting on top of water ... as seen in Italian dressing. This layer is like a blanket that prevents the process of breaking down the carbon monoxide. The health effects: The saturation level of carbon monoxide is measured in "parts per million" (ppm)... or if 1,000,000 air parts were measured, how much of that would be carbon monoxide. On minor levels, it is relatively harmless, but as the levels increase, the bloodstream can become saturated, and much like the ocean, our red bloodcells have some troubles getting the natural air they need to breathe properly. Many health complications are caused when exposed to increased levels of carbon monoxide. Here are some effects of increased carbon monoxide levels: Carbon dioxide, in contrast, doesn't seem to be the main atmospheric harming agent to me. When I see gasoline companies on comercials saying "We're doing research to lower carbon dioxide levels" I wonder if they know what they are doing. Do they have a clue that what we should be concerned with as a consumer is the carbon monoxide levels. I'm thinking, hey, you know it sounds good, but what you're saying sounds like you're trying to pull the wool over everyone's eyes. As seen in the picture near the top 97.4% of the lethal carbon monoxide is from motor vehicles (From the fuel that the Gas company is making). But they show a fancy lab & one hell of a molecule & say, "We're doing what we can to reduce carbon dioxide". On a side note: One thing is certain, it is painfully obvious something is way out of balance. I personally believe this imbalance (caused by abuse, and possibly a misunderstanding between these two molecular chains) could also be the cause of the bees forsaking their hives. Bees are responsible for one out of every three bites that people consume. As their numbers plumet we could rapidly be nearing a global food epidemic. The physiology of a bee is much different than a humans, and as these monoxide levels continue to increase, we are aparently reaching a threshold where Earth's atmosphere is unsuitable for their existence. My best estimate, with a workforce of say, 10-12million people it would take well over 40 years to begin reversing the process. I do believe it is possible to cure the oceans, and reverse the process, but the damage has happened on a scale of 2/3 the Earth's surface 15' deep. Somehow the 50,000,000 Tons of carbon monoxide need to be reduced. I don't think the petrol company's efforts to reduce carbon dioxide will fix the problem with carbon monoxide in time. John Grund xp_lionheart@yahoo.com P.S. Please include Carbon Monoxide in the subject line, if you chose to reply to me directly. Thank you.


What are some love anime sHow is to watch?

I would recommend Pretear, fruits basket, full moon, and blood+


How is carbon monoxide formed by incomplete combustion?

All combustion of carbon containing fuels can produce CO if there is insufficient oxygen to carry the reaction through to full oxidation. Theses rae thetwo overall reacions of alkanes with oxygen:- CnH(2n+2) + (2n+1) 1/2O2 -> nCO + (n+1) H2O CnH(2n+2) + (3n+1) 1/2O2 -> nCO2 + (n+1) H2O There are two overall reactions possible- in excess oxygen the CO from reaction 1 is oxidised to give CO2, (this is the blue flame seen in a log or coal fire) What actually happens is a lot more complex than the reactions above show, combustion involves a reaction pathway with radicals and chain reactions.


How do you get your car on the show bitchin rides?

How do I get my carbon the show what do I have to do


Does smoking cigarettes before blood test?

Nicotine (Cotinine) is not something that is routinely checked for in tox screens. However, it is a chemical, and it does leave traces in both blood and urine for 2 to 4 days. If the aim of the tox screen is specifically to discover evidence of smoking, then yes, a blood sample can show nicotine use.


Does Dungeon fighter online show blood?

Yes, they show some blood.