Considering that the Confederacy lost the Civil War and experienced massive loss of life and destruction of property, yes, they could have better defended their interests by using the existing political mechanisms within the union. War was pretty much the worst possible way to try to defend their interests, as it turned out. Of course, they didn't expect to lose the war. Had they won, they might have been well pleased with the outcome.
=======================================
NO, because the interests of the South were diametrically opposed to those of the North. The North was busy with vast industrial entitles, mills putting out shoes, clothes, and other warm garments for cold weather. They had a surplus of munitions. The South had none of these things.
And, most of all, the North had no idea as to the concern of the South over states' rights, which was a major cause of the War. Slavery was not the chief cause, as many wrtings would have us believe. And the tending of cotton fields, in which many of the slaves worked, would soon be coming to a close due to the impending war, with nobody left to tend the fields.
No political struggle within the union obviously could not be resolved, since there was no resolution before the southern states begin seceeding. One after one the states of the deep south seeded and formed the Confederate States of America, with Jefferson Davis as president.
yea
How did the US go a isolationism foreign policy to a political and military involvement?
Feudalism is a political system in which land is given for military.
Political allegiance and providing military, political, and financial service to a lord. More at LINK
No
hired professional soldier who fights for any state or nation without regard to political interests or issues. From the earliest days of organized warfare until the development of political standing armies in the mid-17th century, governments frequently supplemented their military forces with mercenaries.
Political and military
An aada is an anti-aircraft defended area, a term used in the military.
Joan of Arc
They were dependant on the military because of their loss in the Civil War which makes them feel angry for power.
Lt. Luis Taviel de Andrade
Germany is a member of NATO.
Capable of being held. Now rarely used in the literal sense, and more likely in the military sense of a position or line which can be defended, or by extension of a position in an argument which can be defended.
Dzerzhinsky Political-Military Academy in Warsaw ended in 1990.
Essential in Political, Military and Personal life. Essential in Commerce, Political, Military and Personal life.
Nations making political and military alliances was an effect of militarism.
Dzerzhinsky Political-Military Academy in Warsaw was created in 1951.
The Shang warlords are military leaders who command their own armies. They defended the kingdoms borders from invaders.