Best Answer

I don't recall Jefferson saying that but I do agree with it from todays perspective. Due to some bad reasoning in various decisions the courts have developed an attitude that almost any dispute can become grounds for a constitutional argument and they are increasingly limiting the ability of the people to govern themselves through the legislative process by declaring ever greater spheres of human activity to be constitutionally protected rights despite the fact that the text of the constitution is devoid of even the slightest reference to these things. They are thus changing the meaning of the constitution without the consent of the people of the several states as provided for in the amendment clause of Article five. Michael Montagne

I partially agree with Jefferson's intelligance in this statement. Government is given too much power but it's not just that fact that allows them so much of our nation's power. Government is not only given power but it takes power as well. Every time they do so it's just something small such as tax, so as not to get our citizens of America suspicious. Our people have allowed this to happen over and over again without fighting back and sometimes without even awknowledgement of the situation it's put itself in. Government has power we could not imagine at the moment. If they wanted to lock us inside our house forever until we die they could. The power is given to government no doubt and not very easily changed. It's wether our citizens of America know how much is too much and know when to stop what's happening.

User Avatar

Wiki User

8y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Does Jefferson's warning that courts have too much power apply to the courts today?
Write your answer...
Still have questions?
magnify glass
Related questions

How did the Judiciary act of 1801 Jeffersons power over the courts?

It gave him less power over the courts

How did the judiciary act of 1801 affect jeffersons power over the courts?

He had less power over the courts, since John Adams appointed as many Federalist judges as he could before Jefferson took office. This meant that the new Democratic-Republic president had a powerful Federalist judiciary.

Which arm of the government has the power to interpret and apply laws?

There are three arms of power: Legislative Power, Executive Power and Judicial Power. It is the Judicial Power (The Judges) that has the power to interpret and apply laws in Australia. Courts and judges are independent of parliament and government.

Is the judicial power the power of courts?

Yes. Judicial power is the power of the courts or judges.

What power is defined as the power to interpret laws?

The power to interpret laws is defined as judicial power. It is vested in the courts and allows them to interpret and apply the law to specific cases brought before them. Through this power, courts interpret the meaning and intent of statutes and constitutional provisions to resolve disputes and guide future decisions.

How can federal courts check the president's power?

The federal courts can check the Presidents power by that courts can declare executive actions unconstitutional.

Which branch has power to create lower federal courts?

Congress has the power to create lower federal courts, therefore the Legislative branch has the power to create these courts.

What was thomas jeffersons idea of a republic?

That most power should be in the state legistlatures

What gives power to the judicial system of courts?

The power of the judicial system and courts is derived from the authority granted to them by the constitution and laws of a country. This includes the power to interpret and apply the law, resolve disputes, make decisions, and administer justice. Additionally, the independence of the judiciary from interference by other branches of government ensures its power and credibility.

Who has the judicial power?

The courts.

These courts derive their power from the state constitutions and laws?

federal courts

What were hamiltons and jeffersons impression of national bank?

He opposed it because the Constitution did not grant that power to Congress.