Answer
Very little since it was a unanimous opinion.
Answer
By the time the Supreme Court heard McCulloch v. Maryland,(1819), Federalists no longer dominated the Court. Five of the seven justices were nominated by Democratic-Republican Presidents, and were Democratic-Republicans themselves.
As the answer above indicates, the decision was unanimous; partisanship played little if any role in the outcome of the case, despite the decision favoring the federal government. It's unlikely a justice of any party would allow the states to block creation of or tax a federal bank, especially when the primary purpose of the tax was restraint of trade.
The question of Federalism is invoked by the Court's decision that it is unconstitutional for the states to tax the federal government under the Supremacy Clause of Article VI, Section 2 of the Constitution. While the decision subordinates state sovereignty to the central government, Marshall's position involved a logical interpretation of the Constitution that protected the interests of the federal government. This determination was shared by the five Democratic-Republican party members who represented the majority party on the Court.
Chief Justice
John Marshall........Federalist Party
Associate Justices
Bushrod Washington......Federalist Party
William Johnson............Democratic-Republican
Henry B. Livingston.......Democratic-Republican
Thomas Todd................Democratic-Republican
Gabrielle Duvall.............Democratic-Republican
Joseph Story.................Democratic-Republican
For more information on McCulloch v. Maryland, see Related Questions, below.
Federalism had a strong-hold under Marshall Court. John Marshall, a Federalist, was the 4th Chief Justice of the Supreme Court.
Second US President John Adams nominated his Secretary of State, John Marshall, to succeed Chief Justice Oliver Ellsworth who was retiring due to poor health. Adams was motivated to name a new Chief Justice because he recently learned Thomas Jefferson defeated him in the 1800 Presidential Election. Adams wanted to ensure a member of the Federalist party lead the Court to maintain his party's influence in government.
Fourth Chief Justice of the Supreme Court, John Marshall, who served from 1801 - 1835.
John Marshall served as the 4th Chief Justice of the U.S. from 1801 to his death in 1835. Marshall also served as the Secretary of State under President John Adams. He was also a Federalist (Hamilton's Party) from Virginia. Marshall is credited with authoring many landmark Supreme Court decisions that strengthened the power of the Judicial Branch and the Federal government as a whole. He is arguably considered the most influential Supreme Court justice in history.
The first five Chief Justices of the United States were members of the Federalist party:John JayJohn RutledgeOliver EllsworthJohn MarshallRoger B. TaneyWhen people mention the "Federalist Chief Justice," they are most likely referring to John Marshall, because Marshall's ties to the Federalist party were relevant to the case Marbury v. Madison, (1803).Chief Justice John Marshall was Secretary of State under Federalist President John Adams. When Adams lost the 1800 Presidential election to Democratic-Republican candidate Thomas Jefferson, he quickly nominated Marshall as Chief Justice of the United States, effective when the new administration took office.Adams also exploited the Judiciary Act of 1801, which created 58 new federal judgeships, by appointing only members of his own party to fill those positions. Marshall's appointment, combined with the last-minute Presidential action, inadvertently gave Thomas Jefferson an opportunity to thwart Adams' plan by revoking some of his commissions. This ultimately resulted in the famous Supreme Court case Marbury v. Madison, (1803).For more information about Marbury v. Madison, see Related Links, below.
John Marshall was a federalist who believed in a stronger federal government. As a Chief Justice, John Marshall, helped shape the supreme court by granting it, and the federal government, more power than previously thought. (Marbury v. Madison, McCulloch v. Maryland)
McCulloch v. Maryland: Chief Justice Marshall
McCulloch v. Maryland: Chief Justice Marshall
John Marshall
Early in Chief Justice Marshall's tenure on the Supreme Court, the majority of votes were unanimous; the other justices usually voted with Marshall, who then wrote the opinion of the court himself.Marshall's influence weakened in the waning days of his career, as more Democratic-Republicans were appointed to succeed Federalist justices.
Federalism had a strong-hold under Marshall Court. John Marshall, a Federalist, was the 4th Chief Justice of the Supreme Court.
Chief Justice John Marshall wrote the only opinion issued for McCulloch v. Maryland; the case was decided by a unanimous vote of 7-0.Case Citation:McCulloch v. Maryland, 17 US 316 (1819)
He was the 4th Chief Justice of the US Supreme Court, and the longest serving. He helped to establish the Supreme Court as the final authority on the meaning of the Constitution.
This case allowed for a broad interpretation of the powers of the federal government.
Chief Justice John Marshall, who served on the Court from 1801-1835, had the longest term by far at 34+ years.When Federalist John Adams nominated Marshall to the Court, after losing the 1800 Presidential election to Democratic-Republican Thomas Jefferson, members of the Federalist party dominated the judiciary. Although Thomas Jefferson was able to replace three of six justices during his Presidential term, two of the three adopted Marshall's style of jurisprudence and voted with him on most decisions.Although opposition to Marshall's perspective grew toward the end of his career as different political parties gained power and the Federalists faded, Marshall's keen mind and strong personality ensured he remained the dominant power on the Court throughout his life.Marshall's opinions in cases like Marbury v. Madison,(1803), Fletcher v. Peck, (1810), and McCulloch v. Maryland, (1819), firmly established the doctrines of judicial review and federal supremacy such that his influence is still felt today.
Chief Justice John Marshall served from 1801 until his death in 1835, a tenure of 34 years.When Federalist John Adams nominated Marshall to the Court, after losing the 1800 Presidential election to Democratic-Republican Thomas Jefferson, members of the Federalist party dominated the judiciary. Although Thomas Jefferson was able to replace three of six justices during his Presidential term, two of the three adopted Marshall's style of jurisprudence and voted with him on most decisions.Although opposition to Marshall's perspective grew toward the end of his career as different political parties gained power and the Federalists faded, Marshall's keen mind and strong personality ensured he remained the dominant power on the Court throughout his life.Marshall's opinions in cases like Marbury v. Madison,(1803), Fletcher v. Peck, (1810), and McCulloch v. Maryland, (1819), firmly established the doctrines of judicial review and federal supremacy such that his influence is still felt today.
Absolutely. Marshall was a loyal federalist who strongly believed in the value of the Constitution. As Chief Justice of the Supreme Court, he helped ensure the Articles of the Constitution empowered the federal government.