compromise
the successful party was the democrats party because hoover was doing a bad job with the Great depression so Franklin roosevelt promised he would do a better job so he is now president by chase.s
Military leadership and dealing with foreign nations require quick and decisive action, especially in an emergency. Both conditions are more likely when control is held by one person and not a large group of legislators with varying opinions. The president also has access to relevant secret information through executive agencies like the CIA and NSC that is not widely available to Congress
The public is encouraged to let their Representative and Senators know how they feel regarding issues before Congress. Petitions have a better chance of having an influence, but they also accept phone calls, e-mails and letters.
no he was not
Carter is noted for his involvement with Habitat for Humanity.
Compromise
then it lets them control military better
The Republicans
the successful party was the democrats party because hoover was doing a bad job with the Great depression so Franklin roosevelt promised he would do a better job so he is now president by chase.s
Better ask them
Very respected. But hated by the democrats. ( Search for a better answer )
Historically....no. http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/economics-blog/2012/aug/29/democrats-better-wall-street-republicans but how far back you go (history) is debatable....my guess....the two topics are almost mutually exclusive.
Yes. The evidence is overwhelming. In most cases, democrats grow out of their reckless, impressionable phase ,start paying taxes and become Republicans.
The democratic stance on education focuses on improving the standards of public schools. Democrats typically feel that improvements in classroom size and accountability could make public school education better.
King Khalid is better.
The president can move quickly and with one mind. He also has only one staff to keep from leaking secrets instead of 535 staffs to control.
You need not be ashamed, but why do you simply accept that you are not as good at writing papers? Can you not learn to do better at that as well?You need not be ashamed, but why do you simply accept that you are not as good at writing papers? Can you not learn to do better at that as well?You need not be ashamed, but why do you simply accept that you are not as good at writing papers? Can you not learn to do better at that as well?You need not be ashamed, but why do you simply accept that you are not as good at writing papers? Can you not learn to do better at that as well?