In a representative monarchy (Like Britain's not too sure what it's called), they bear significant influence despite having no real political power, just look at the duke and duchess of Cambridge! In real monarchies you would want to be one because you would achieve ultimate power, your word was law. You would have the pick of the ladies and maybe men (this was rare as women usually don't have much power in past monarchies). Basically like a Dictatorship.
Chat with our AI personalities
By 1791, many sans-culottes demanded a republic, or government ruled by elected officials instead of a monarch.
States wanted written constitutions for two main reasons. First, a written constitution would spell out the rights of all citizens. Second, it would set limits on the power of the government. Are you working out of the American Nation textbook too?It is amazing
Generally, this was the practice of isolationists. If you want a specific group, the American Bund (pro-Nazis) would have argued against aid to the Allies for obvious reasons.
There were several reasons. Women were considered not to have the stamina to work long hours (outside of the home, that is). Women, as a whole, supposedly would not have the minds able to understand something so unfeminine. It was thought that women would take the jobs from men who needed them, and that families would suffer greatly with the women not home. Men did not want to supervisor or work with women.
Not exactly, they would want people to be able to pray in school, but this country was founded on religious freedom and they would want all religions to be able to pray in school.