Gary Hart's campaign for the presidential nomination was derailed by an adulterous affair. There may have been others with the same problem.
Bill Clinton was so accused by one Jennifer Flowers.
a person who swore that the accused was innocent
i want answer of this question
a person who swore that the accused was innocent
No.
John Brown
bush
He was running for vice-president in 1952 and was accused of improper use of campaign funds. He made his famous Checkers speech and saved himself. He gave the "Checkers" speech.(apex)
Abraham Lincoln
John Quincy Adams was accused of making a corrupt bargain with Henry Clay. This allegation arose after the contentious 1824 presidential election, where no candidate won a majority of electoral votes. Adams was elected president by the House of Representatives, and shortly thereafter, he appointed Clay as his Secretary of State, leading to widespread accusations of a backroom deal.
The United States presidential election of 1828 saw an unusually large number of personal attacks from the campaign of both Andrew Jackson and John Quincy Adams. Andrew Jackson's campaign accused Adams of purchasing gambling devices with public funds, when in reality they were a chess set and a pool table. John Quincy Adams' campaign attacked Jackson's wife as a bigamist because her divorce hadn't finalized when she married Jackson.
She was accused of being a bigamist
None. Nor is it their place or remit to do so.
He was falsely accused of swearing in class.The candidate falsely told the interviewers that he did not have a criminal record.
yes he did in 1948 way long before he was accused of cheating during the presidential electrical did i answer your question?
Promotion, as in the preferment (promotion) went to the best candidate; The act of making formal accusations, as in the preferment of charges against the accused
Richard Nixon made this noteworthy speech after he was accused to improprieties with campaign funding. "Checkers" was a dog that he had accepted as a gift.
No, and they don't work for Romney either. In every campaign since CNN first went on the air in the early 1980s, candidates from both sides have accused it (and later accused other networks) of bias. Just because a story or an event seems favorable to one candidate, the opponents will immediately take to the airwaves and to print, accusing the media of not being fair to their side. Actually, in a polarized world, where left-wing partisans and right-wing partisans have their own networks to watch, and each side is firmly convinced that the media are "in the tank" for the opposing candidate, CNN has tried very hard to maintain a middle-ground. It is not an easy task, but evidence shows that most of the time, they succeed.