The theory you are probably thinking of was nullification, a doctrine proposed by Thomas Jefferson before he became President. Jefferson's theory was not exactly as stated, however. He believed that a state could only nullify an act of Congress if it were unconstitutional. However, at the time, there would have been no clear way to judge whether an Act of Congress, contested by one or more states, was unconstitutional. The doctrine of judicial review had not yet been established. Nullification was most famously attempted by South Carolina during the Jackson administration. A convention of South Carolina citizens passed a resolution stating that a federal tariff law was unconstitutional, null and void. Subsequently, the South Carolina legislature passed legislation meant to enforce this resolution in the state courts. South Carolina's stance was influential in getting Congress to change the law, but President Jackson also threatened to send in troops if South Carolina did not back down (similar to President Washington's actions in Pennsylvania in 1794.) While nullification was not an explicit issue in the Civil War, given the connotations attached to the idea of state sovereignty after the defeat of the Confederate States, the doctrine was largely repudiated afterwards.
Congress attempted to stop discussion on the slavery issue after they were flooded by over 100,000 petitions urging the abolition of slavery in the 1830's. In 1836, they passed a resolution that banned the discussion of these petitions and enforced the ban in 1839, 1841 and 1843. However, John Quincy Adams, who believed this was unfair, came up with creative methods of bringing the debate up on the floor anyway.
people should resist unfair laws (apex)
In Andrew jacksons presidential cabinet his vice president john C. Calhoun Supported nullification, he even wrote the south Carolina exposition and protest which was about nullification of a tariff
protection from unfair actions by the goverment
The system of checks and balances is used to keep the government from getting too powerful in one branch. Often this represents a circular arrangement, for example:- The executive branch can veto bills from the legislative, but- The legislative can override the veto.Executive Branch1. The President is the commander-in-chief of the army and the navy, but only Congress can declare war.2. The President nominates judges.3. The President can veto congressional legislation.Legislative Branch1. Congress approves presidential nominations.2. Congress controls the budget.3. Congress can pass laws over the president's veto.4. Congress can impeach the president and remove him/her from office.5. The Senate confirms the president's nominations (for judges, etc.).Judicial Branch1. The Court can declare laws unconstitutional.2. The Court can declare presidential acts unconstitutional.
Many lost their land when Anglos passes an unfair law. -apex
States' rights, unfair tariffs, and unfair representation in congress. Slavery was but a minor issue in 1861.
No. Generally, Congress tries to ensure laws accomplish some purpose on their agenda, without regard for the interests of, or fairness to, all parties affected by their legislation (which would be impossible, anyway). Regardless of the law passed, some group is guaranteed to believe the legislation is unfair or unconstitutional.
President Vetoing a law passed by congressCongress overriding a Presidents VetoThe court can declare congressional and presidential acts to be unconstitutional. Congress can override a president's veto. The president appoints supreme court judges.In the American Government, when the President vetoes something, it gets sent back to Congress to be reviewed again and Congress can override that if they believe the President's decision is unfair.
Chicken :3
They were unfair and harsh. With high tax rates.
enabling legislation is a law passed by congress to specify the name, purposes, functions, and powers of administrative agency- enabling statute is the federal trade commission= act prohibits unfair competition and deceptive trade practices.
that it was unfair and injustice that it shouldn't matter what race you are as long as you are a creature of God
Voting.
Representatives from nine colonies met to discuss the problems of unfair taxation. This meeting was called the Stamp Act Congress.
First Continental Congress. :)
When the First Continental Congress met in 1774, the members expressed their frustration with King George and his unfair laws.