On appeal, when a trial court of general jurisdiction offers a new trial instead of the review of the lower court's decision, it is giving a
compromise of 1850
The Old Wembley Stadium became derelict and instead of a renovation a decision was made to demolish and rebuild a New Wembley Stadium.
General Cornwallis did not surrender personally to George Washington. Instead he sent a deputy to do the job.
i think the senate and the vice presidentmostly his cabinetThe Cabinet helps the President decide by giving advice and information, but actually making the decision is the President's job. If the President is on vacation or otherwise unavailable to make a decision, the Vice President decides instead.
Yes, they can.However, if the decision involves a question of federal or constitutional law and the case is petitioned to the US Supreme Court for a writ of certiorari, and if the U.S. Supreme Court grants certiorari, and if the U.S. Supreme Court rules differently from the state supreme court, the state is bound by the U.S. Supreme Court decision under the doctrine of Stare decisis, which is abbreviated from a Latin phrase that means "let the decision stand."
Jurisdiction means the power, right and authority to interpret and apply law. The two primary types of jurisdiction discussed in relation to the US Supreme Court are original jurisdiction and appellate jurisdiction.The court that first hears a case, or holds a trial, has original jurisdiction. The trial judge or jury are "triers of fact"; they examine evidence, listen to testimony, and try to make a fair decision about whether the information they're provided is sufficient (in criminal cases) to find a defendant guilty "beyond a reasonable doubt."If one party disagrees with the judge or jury decision at the trial level, he (or she) can appeal his case to the next higher court. Courts that hear appeals from trial courts have appellate jurisdiction. Appellate courts are not triers of fact; they don't look at evidence or hear testimony. Instead, they try to determine whether the trial or decision conformed with the law and constitution, and whether the trial procedures and jury instructions were followed correctly enough to allow a fair trial.The US Supreme Court only has original jurisdiction over a small class of cases, and typically only considers disputes between the states under its original jurisdiction, while the lower federal courts handle the rest of the caseload. Conflicts between states don't occur very often, so these cases only represent a small portion of the Court's work.Most of the cases the Supreme Court reviews were first tried in (for example) US District Court, and (usually) appealed to a US Court of Appeals Circuit Court. The Supreme Court then acts as the "court of last resort," or the final decision-maker (appellate jurisdiction), over cases it considers important to the national interest. This is what is meant by "the majority of cases to the US Supreme Court come through appellate jurisdiction."
Trial de novo
An appellate court hears and decides the issues on appeal.
Yes, a pardon is NOT a reversal of the court findings or decision but instead is a general forgiveness of the offense and all the restrictions that went along with it.
What is gained is that a decision is actually made, instead of procrastinating or dithering, or avoiding. Whether a decision is good or bad is determined by its outcome.
General Rahl was immersed in a chess game instead of reading the note.
It means the decision has been reversed, and (usually) that a claim which was initially denied has instead been accepted.
Writing his poem in Italian instead of Latin allowed Dante to reach a wider audience and helped in the development of the Italian vernacular as a literary language. This decision also served to democratize literature by making it more accessible to the general populace, rather than just the elite who could read Latin.
What is one characteristic of galaxies that requires the use of General Relativity instead of Newtonian theory?
Read you book instead of cheatting on your homework
instead of having two or more people involed in your decision ,there is only one.
Federal diversity jurisdiction (diversity of citizenship) allows citizens of different states to file civil action against each other in federal court (instead of state court) under certain circumstances. Diversity jurisdiction may be invoked for civil cases involving claims in excess of $75,000.