There are many powers not given to the Federal government in the Constitution. Specifically it states that any power not specifically granted to the government will be reserved for the States (interpreted as for the people).
No, actually the reverse. The Constitution states that all powers not specifically granted to the Federal Government are reserved for the state.
Senate approval of nominations to the supreme court
expressed powers
elastic clause
The constitution was established for the Federal Government. It really has nothing to do with the people, and everything to do with what the Federal Government is allowed to do, and how it is set up.
Strict constructionalists believe that the federal government can only do that which is authorized in the Constitution.
There are many powers not given to the Federal government in the Constitution. Specifically it states that any power not specifically granted to the government will be reserved for the States (interpreted as for the people).
Delegated powers
In the US Constitution, this document specifies what are the responsibilities of the federal government. Duties and responsibilities not specifically delegated to the federal government are therefore the responsibilities of the states.
Expressed Powers
Powers not specifically given to the federal government by the Constitution but which are logically related, or required, to exercise enumerated powers are called implied or inherent powers. They are also sometimes referred to as unenumerated powers.
No, it would be illegal for the federal government to place such a restriction but not for smaller units of government to do so. This is assuming that you are referring to the United States' constitution and not a particular state. Powers not specifically taken by the federal government in the Constitution are granted to the states. This power is typically allowed to roll downhill to counties, towns, and even subdivisions.
No, actually the reverse. The Constitution states that all powers not specifically granted to the Federal Government are reserved for the state.
The American Constitution delegates all powers not specifically assigned to the Federal government to the States. This is know as the 'residual powers clause' and is outlined in Article I.
No, it would be illegal for the federal government to place such a restriction but not for smaller units of government to do so. This is assuming that you are referring to the United States' constitution and not a particular state. Powers not specifically taken by the federal government in the Constitution are granted to the states. This power is typically allowed to roll downhill to counties, towns, and even subdivisions.
Senate approval of nominations to the supreme court