In the United States the First Amendment to the Constitution states that there should be no establishment of religion--
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
Government should not foist any religion on me, nor should it prevent me to worship in the way I want.
AnswerReligion and government must be separate because our society is multi-faceted with numerous religious denominations and every other degree of belief and non-belief in deities. A government-sponsored religion would choose one and then force the people to obey the doctrines of that religion. Its doctrines would inform the laws, its religious leaders will gain too much power and that type of power corrupts. Religious majorities have historically been extremely unfair to minorities. The separation between church and state must be guarded in order to preserve freedom.
Most of the founders viewed religious interference as damaging to government. Most were deists who believe in the existence of a remote deity who got things started and then backed off, not interfering with the day-to-day existence of humankind. The type of religionists who want to deny church-state separation today seek to impose their man-made religious dogma on the society-at-large. That is exactly what the founders sought to avoid.
Chat with our AI personalities
Because every free individual in a free society should have the right to worship as he or she sees fit, as long as they do not impinge on the rights of others. The United States Constitution protects its citizen's rights regarding this issue. It is why our forefathers left Europe. As an aside, it follows that the followers of any religion that do not respect other religions should leave the country in which religious freedom is guaranteed.
Thank God that Benjamin Franklin was there to edit the document penned by Thomas Jefferson. At his funeral, the leaders of every religious denomination in our country at the time held hand in procession and in respect for this Divinely Inspired Man.
JimA
It is not important, at all, to separate religion from the "State" (the government)
What IS important, and is the ONLY restriction in the US Constitution is that the Federal government make no laws regarding the practice of religion . . . that is, the government cannot make a law, for example, saying that Islam must be taught in schools, but Christianity cannot be taught. That would be unConstitutional.
Because over the history of mankind, religious groups and individuals have used religion to manipulate governments to obtain power and riches, and a lot of people are tired of it. Since the beginning of human history, people have tried to reign over others, and have used all of their resources available... including the superstition and the need that humans have to worship God.
federal or confederal states
It's a day that a certin religion celebrates because it is important in their beleif. Christmas, for example, would be a religious feast because it is important that Jesus was born.
The state capital is important because the state goverment conducts bussiness(such as taxes)
The Great Awakening was important,because it was when religious freedom was there
government leader individual the state religious leader
A non-secular state is one that does not separate government activities and institutions from religious institutions. It implies that religion plays a significant role in the governance and policies of the state.
Calvin believed that the church and state should be separate but the consistory tried moral and religious offenders.
In a Muslim state, the civil and religious ruler is typically separate. The civil ruler is responsible for governance and administration, while the religious ruler, such as a Caliph or an Imam, is responsible for spiritual guidance and upholding Islamic teachings. Their roles may overlap in some cases, but they generally serve distinct functions in a Muslim state.
Hermit.
Wyoming is a separate property state.Wyoming is a separate property state.Wyoming is a separate property state.Wyoming is a separate property state.
The Two-Nation Theory was critical in shaping the demand for a separate Muslim state, leading to the creation of Pakistan in 1947. It emphasized the distinct religious and cultural identities of Muslims and Hindus in British India, influencing the partition of the subcontinent.
Punjab probably...or one can urgue new and separate provice- Islamabad
The Acropolis was an important part of the city and state because it was a major religious gathering point. It was also where the events in government took place in Ancient Greece.
The term you may be looking for is "theocracy," where a state is governed by religious authorities or principles.
State control of religion is associated with religious control of state, although the latter is usually more subtle. Some people of strong religious faith may regard a degree of religious influence in politics to be a good thing, but overlook the consequent risk of the state influencing religion.One way to avoid state control of religion is to be alert to any attempts by religion to control the political agenda. Another is to make the political leaders aware that we want a clear separation of church and state.
The separation of church and state is important because it ensures that religious beliefs do not dictate government policies and vice versa. This concept is often associated with the Bible verse Matthew 22:21, where Jesus says to "render unto Caesar the things that are Caesar's, and unto God the things that are God's." This verse emphasizes the idea of keeping religious and governmental matters separate.
Yes. One of the hallmarks of Atatürk's leadership was the creation of a completely secular Turkish Republic. Mosque and State were separated and Suleiman's religious law was generally abandoned.