The compromise that the Framers reached on the issues of the tariffs and slavery were, to lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts, and Excises, also to regulate the Commerce with foreign Nations, and among the several Sates, and with the Indian Tribes. So the Constitution gave Congress the power to place tariffs on imports, and the Congress was also given the power to control both the interstate and foreign trade. So to agreement with the Southern delegates the Framers from the North agreed to the Southern demands on slavery issue.
Almost all tariffs, from the beginning of American government to the Gilded Age and even beyond, were opposed by the South. Tariffs helped Northern manufacturing but increased the prices of manufactured goods for Southern farmers.
the government passed tariffs to raise taxes
John C. Calhoun argued that the tariffs violated equal rights. According to his perspective, tariffs not only favored the northern states, but also harmed the southern states. Imported goods hurt the income of all people in South Carolina. As far as Calhoun was concerned, helping support the northern industrial base was not the purpose of the federal government.
the north and the south both had differnt veiws or belives on tariffs. The North wanted tariffs and the south did not.
They depended on goods from Europe.
Southerners were upset by the tariffs of 1828, often called the "Tariff of Abominations," because they disproportionately benefited Northern industries while increasing costs for Southern consumers who relied on imported goods. The South, primarily agrarian, felt economically marginalized and argued that these tariffs favored industrial interests at their expense. Additionally, they feared that high tariffs could lead to retaliatory measures that would harm their cotton exports. This discontent contributed to rising tensions between the North and South, ultimately fueling discussions of states' rights and nullification.
They depended on goods from Europe.
The possibility of higher tariffs upset southerners because they relied heavily on the export of agricultural products, particularly cotton, which would become more expensive for foreign buyers if tariffs were imposed. Higher tariffs could lead to retaliatory measures from other countries, harming southern economies. Additionally, southerners viewed tariffs as favoring northern industrial interests at their expense, exacerbating regional tensions and contributing to the sense of economic inequality between the North and South.
the tariffs did not benfit trade in southern cities.
Hey
protective tariffs - apex
They hated tariffs. All they were making was cotton. Tariffs increased the cost of imports.
Most southern plantation owners were against tariffs because they relied heavily on importing goods, such as manufactured products from the North and Europe. Tariffs would increase the cost of these imports, making them more expensive for Southern consumers. Additionally, Southern economies depended on exporting cash crops like cotton, and they feared that tariffs could provoke retaliatory measures from other countries, harming their export markets. Consequently, they viewed tariffs as a threat to their economic interests and way of life.
NO the southern states did not like the tariffs.
Protective tariffs-Apex
Both northern and southern states in the United States had tariffs at different times, but they had differing perspectives on their use. The northern states generally supported tariffs to protect their burgeoning industries, while the southern states opposed them, as they relied on imported goods and feared tariffs would increase costs. This economic divide contributed to tensions leading up to the Civil War. Ultimately, the conflict over tariffs was part of the broader regional disputes between the North and the South.