Ten Theories on the fall of Rome:
African slaves outnumbered the indigenous population by nearly 50 percent.
The decline of the Mayan and Olmec Empires was likely due to a combination of factors, including environmental degradation, overpopulation, warfare, and political instability. The Mayan civilization may have faced challenges such as droughts, deforestation, and soil erosion, which could have led to food shortages and social unrest. Additionally, the Olmec Empire may have been impacted by conflicts with neighboring societies and internal power struggles. These factors likely contributed to the eventual collapse of both civilizations.
The previous empires in western Asia - the Assyrian and Babylonian Empires were in decline. Persia, by uniting with Media, had superior unified force and was able to capitalise on this decline, taking over western Asia progressively and then central Asia, meeting no unified opposition. They copied their predecessors by leaving/putting in place local administrations, and supervised these through provincial Persian governors. And the king and his council kept overall direction, and the control of internal and external security.
Cortez and Pizarro were able to conquer the Incas and Aztecs fairly easily due to several factors. These factors include superior military technology such as firearms, steel weapons, and armor, as well as the strategic use of horses, which were unfamiliar to the indigenous peoples. Additionally, the Spanish benefited from alliances with indigenous groups who were enemies of the Aztecs and Incas, as well as the devastating impact of European diseases like smallpox, which decimated the native populations. The Spanish also exploited internal divisions and political instability within the Aztec and Inca empires to their advantage.
It had two conquering kings - Cyrus the Great and Cambyses, and a succession of consolidating kings starting with Darius the Great. This not only extended the empire, but also retained it by establishing provincial government to control and defend the different areas, and retaining traditional local government forms which were compatible with the diverse range of peoples, cities and tribes within the empire. Not that this was unique, the previous Assyrian and Babylonian empires used similar means, but the Persians just did it better, and for over two hundred years were able to maintain control, stability and prosperity until ambitious Alexander the Great became the wrecker, turned it into an empire of his own, died and left chaos in his wake.
Centralized government control, effective administration, and a common cultural or religious identity were key factors in holding ancient empires together. Strong infrastructure, communication networks, and military power also played a significant role in maintaining cohesion within the realm of an empire.
because europeans were very powerful and we knew the technique of building empires
Group cohesion refers to the degree of solidarity, unity, and commitment among group members. It reflects the bonds that hold group members together and influences the overall effectiveness and performance of the group. Group cohesion can be influenced by factors such as communication, shared goals, and interpersonal relationships within the group.
An increase in regional interaction. Apex
Team cohesion can be measured through surveys, interviews, and observation of team dynamics. Surveys typically assess factors like trust, communication, and collaboration among team members. Interviews with team members can provide more in-depth insights into their perceptions of cohesion. Observation of team interactions and productivity can also provide clues about the level of cohesion within the team.
Expansion of transcontinental trade routes
military conquest
Expansion of transcontinental trade routes
You need to specify which two empires you are referring to if you want to make it possible to answer your question.
TradeIron WorkLand ExpansionFarm LandNatural ResourcesA good KingTHESE ARE THE FACTORS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
feeling threatened unmanaged anger lack of respect bullying and gangs
Social stability refers to a state of balance and order within a society, where there is a sense of security, harmony, and cohesion among its members. It involves the absence of widespread conflict, social unrest, and disruptive factors that could threaten the well-being and functioning of the community. Social stability is often associated with factors such as economic prosperity, effective governance, and social cohesion.