0
What else can I help you with?
What was the role of the emperor in the Aztec empire?
In the Aztec empire, the emperor is worshiped as a living god and enjoys unquestioned authority. Although they weren't always able to in the past, women can now become empresses.
Why did the Incas unite their empire?
The Incas mainly united their empire so that they could combine their industrial and military advancements. They were able to better accomplishments due to advanced roadways and a government headed by the Sapa Inca and the regional heads below them.
Why did Romans biuld so many roads?
Because they needed to be able to quickly move troops to any part of the Empire where trouble was brewing: either local uprises or intrusions by tribes from outside the Roman Empire.
How were the Inca able to conquer such a vast empire?
How were the inca to conquer such a vast empire
How were Inca able to conquer such a vast empire?
How were the inca to conquer such a vast empire
Who was last Roman Emperor who was able to unite the empire was?
Constantine
Why was Christianity able ti rise so quickly through the roman empire?
Because emperor Constantine adopted it as the national religion of the empire to try to unite it
Why did the Byzantine Empire flourish after the fall of the Western Roman Empire?
After the fall of the Western Roman Empire, Emperor Justinian was able to bring back many traits and traditions of the Roman empire. Justinian not only was able to revive the Roman Empire, but was able to create his own legacy. (yes, I am in AP World History)
Why were the Byzantines able to maintain the eastern half of the roman empire?
Because Justinian the emperor of the Byzantine emperor in the beginning tried to rebuild the Eastern empire. He reunited the empire. Doing so he simplified the law codes, endorsed building programs, and built off of the old Roman empire.
Was lucius septimius severus a good emperor?
Yes, he was able to dig the roman empire away from their trust issues.
How might roads unite an empire?
The countries that are trying to unite will be able to commute with each other.
Why wasn't the roman empire able to produce enough food?
The Roman Empire was able to produce enough food.
Why do you think the roman emperor split in two?
There has never been a Roman emperor who was split in two. If you mean the Roman empire, that too, was never split. The terms Western and Eastern regarding the Roman empire was/is a devise used by historians in their writings so that their readers are able to understand them more clearly. When the western part of the empire fell, the empire continued despite the loss of its western territories. The closest that the empire ever came to being "split" was when Diocletian divided it into four areas with his two Caesars and two Augusti, which were supposed to make the vast Roman territory easier to rule.
What happened to the roman empire when it entered the dark ages?
The short story is that the West Roman Empire was destroyed by Germanic Tribes, who set up their own kingdoms, and the East Roman Empire survived for another thousand years, until it was destroyed in 1453. The Roman Empire was divided for administrative purposes under Diocletian in 293. In the following years, it reunited and redivided several times. Its last division happened in 395, when Emperor Theodosius died. This left the West Roman Empire and the East Roman Empire. The West Roman Empire was invaded by a number of large armies of Germanic tribes, including Visigoths, Vandals, Franks, and others. These set up kingdoms of their own, and the power of the West Roman Empire declined rapidly. According to our history books, the Dark Ages began in 476, when the last emperor of the West Roman Empire, Romulus Augustulus, was deposed. Even this is not all that clearly true. Julius Nepos, who preceded Romulus Augustulus, was still in power in some places until he died in 480. The people who deposed Romunus Augustulus went to the Emperor of the East Roman Empire, and said they no longer needed a separate emperor. So, in theory, the Roman Empire was reunited in 476. The truth is, the only thing the East got out of the deal was Italy, and it did not have any firm hold on that. Soon, Italy was invaded and taken by Ostrogoths, and the East Roman Empire lost all its possessions in the West. Emperor Justinian I organized invasions of the West in the early 6th century. He took over the Roman possessions in Africa, Italy, and part of Spain. But the situation went into decline again when he died. The East Roman Empire of this period is called the Byzantine Empire by our historians, and it endured, flowering at one time and declining at others, until 1453. The institutions of the West Roman Empire did not simply go away in 476. The Roman Senate kept meeting for a long time. We have records of their actions as late as 603, but they may have continued. Schools that existed under the Roman Empire sometimes were able to continue operation in the Dark Ages. The University of Salerno can trace its origins to a set of medical schools that moved to Salerno because of the Germanic invasions. One School in Wales that was opened under Emperor Theodosius, while the Roman Empire was still united, was finally closed by King Henry VIII, in the Renaissance. When Charlemagne was crowned emperor, it was an attempt to revive the West Roman Empire, so he was called Emperor of the Roman People. Empress Irene, who was the monarch of the Byzantine Empire of the time (which was the continuation of the old Roman Empire) was not amused. Charlemagne's empire was divided by his son's heirs, but there was an attempt to revive even that, again called the Roman Empire, but this time it changed its name to the Holy Roman Empire. It continued until it was destroyed by Napoleon. There are still people around today who claim to be the rightful heirs to the throne of the Roman Empire.
Why was Roman Emperor so significant?
There were so many Roman emperors because the Roman empire lasted for a long, long, time.There were so many Roman emperors because the Roman empire lasted for a long, long, time.There were so many Roman emperors because the Roman empire lasted for a long, long, time.There were so many Roman emperors because the Roman empire lasted for a long, long, time.There were so many Roman emperors because the Roman empire lasted for a long, long, time.There were so many Roman emperors because the Roman empire lasted for a long, long, time.There were so many Roman emperors because the Roman empire lasted for a long, long, time.There were so many Roman emperors because the Roman empire lasted for a long, long, time.There were so many Roman emperors because the Roman empire lasted for a long, long, time.
Why wasn't roman empire able to implement a direct democracy?
?
How was it possible for Odoacer to remove Romulus Augustulus as ruler?
Odoacer, a Germanic chieftain, was able to remove Romulus Augustulus, the last Roman emperor of the West, due to the weakened state of the Western Roman Empire, which was plagued by internal strife, economic decline, and military defeats. In 476 AD, Odoacer led a revolt against the imperial authority, capitalizing on the lack of support for Romulus and the general disillusionment with the Roman leadership. After deposing him, Odoacer declared himself king and sent the imperial regalia to the Eastern Roman Emperor, effectively ending the Western Roman Empire.
