answersLogoWhite

0

Though this fact goes against the usual story told today, originally the fact is, many African parents sold their own child or children into bondage for a number of reasons including poverty and lack of food in the immediate area or region. When sailing ships came by, these "sales" occurred. This is a well-known fact of history, though it gets buried in today's story of black slavery. (The same thing occurred after the eruption of Mount Tambora in Indonesia between 1805-1815. After the major eruptions, food crops were wiped out. Parents sold their children to passing ships just to get food. Whole families 'willingly' entered being owned by Whites just so the Indonesian people could get away from the stricken area.)

However, Whites-colonizers already had a colonizing and conquering mentality. They were not aversive to taking slaves--after all, slavery, which is power over a less popular or less powerful group of people, has occurred in many civilizations throughout history and all ancient civilizations. Along that line, White sailors who used to take children the parents sold for food or money then began to enact slavery even when the parents did not desire to sell their children.

By this point, the type of African slavery described today began. Whites took men, women, children, or whole families against their wills. When British, French, and Spanish colonized America, the elite Whites began to believe they were entitled to slavery. As the US South developed into farming, especially cotton, Whites believed they economically needed African slaves to do the work --both in White plantation homes and in the fields.


While some people in the North (northeast US) did originally own slaves and the North was primarily agriculture, the practice of slavery boomed in the South even long after most Northerners had freed their slaves. Southern plantation owners believed their plantations would fail without the free labor.


So the story told today about Black slavery origins 'forgets' this piece about how the sale of Africans truly began. There is no shame in the true story---it was simply a fact that when people had no food, they went to desperate means to make sure their children survived. That Whites then used their power to force Africans into slavery is true---but White-power was not how African slavery started.


Anyone willing to study history of civilizations will find these are the facts: Slavery began from desperation of circumstances on the African continent that forced parents to choose to sell their children in exchange for money / something of value, or for food. Whites simply took advantage of these circumstances....and much later, began to simply take people against their wills.



NOTE: While "slavery" is the primary word used today, originally even Whites were "indentured" to other Whites, even from Anglo-Saxon groups coming from Europe (first Britain, then Wales, Ireland, etc.). Indenturehood was a form of limited slavery in which one male "owned" the life and livelihood of another person. White people were often made Indentured Servants for a decade to several decades (or lifetime) to pay off their debt to the "Master"/owner, including debts owed from life in their native country. Many settlers also could not afford passage to come to the US---and so, became the property of another richer White who paid their way here. So US history followed a British-colonizing pattern of making the poorest, most uneducated people (Whites) work for or on behalf of rich and more educated White elite. Black slavery in the US came from this same mentality, but for Blacks it often meant lifetime bondage.



User Avatar

Wiki User

9y ago

What else can I help you with?

Continue Learning about Anthropology

Is it true that African slaves were brought to replace native American slaves who died from disease or over work?

No, not true. The first African American slave arrived in the American colonies in 1619 and prior to that there were no slaves. The Spanish did attempt to make Southwestern Native Americans into slaves, but it didn't work out. When the English colonies began in 1607 with Jamestown there was no thought of using the Native Americans as slaves. The Northeastern tribes did not lend themselves to this type activity. Jamestown settled into an area of over 14,000 Native Americans and 8,000 miles of settlement/land and they were only 104 men, so if any slavery had been attempted the Native Americans would have won the battle. In 1492 Columbus did suggest in his diary that the naives he found in the Bahamas would make good slaves and the Spanish missions did treat the Native Americans in the Western areas poorly and killing them, but the slave trade of African American people began because the labor was needed and Indentured servants didn't work out.


Why did the spanish use black slaves?

The Spanish used black slaves for agricultural, mining, and domestic labor in their colonies to support their economic activities. This practice was justified by the demand for cheap labor and the belief in the inferiority of African peoples at that time.


Why did Africa sell their own people as slaves?

They didn't. Africans were often kidnapped by colonists to be slaves in America. That statement is not correct. Do your homework. Some were kidnapped and not by colonist, but slave traders. Others were sold by their own people. They either owed a debt, were captives of war, criminals, or had charges made up to make them look like criminals, to be sold off for a profit.


Why did the Spanish take the first African slaves to Hispaniola?

The islands were producing far more agriculturally at this time then the mainland, so it make sense that the first African slaves went to Hispaniola. The crops that were being grown during the 16th and 17 century in this area were very labor intensive. Due to disease and all that, that native Taino population on the island was wiped out and it was therefore necessary for the Spanish plantation owners to look elsewhere for cheap labor. The beginning of the slave trade comes about after pretty much the same sequence of events everywhere in the Americas, just at different times. Need for increased labor --> loss of native population from disease --> slave trade


After 1676 african slavery became the main form of labor when?

After 1676, African slavery became the main form of labor in the American colonies as a result of the decline of white indentured servitude. This shift occurred after Bacon's Rebellion exposed the risks of relying on indentured servants for labor, prompting plantation owners to turn to enslaved Africans as a more reliable and permanent source of labor.

Related Questions

Why did people trad African American slaves?

To make money.


Europeans were the first to make slaves of African people. True Or False?

True.


Why were the African slaves taken away from their home?

Because other African tribes defeated them in battle and captured them as slaves, then sold them to Europeans. Note, it was other Africans that made slaves of Africans and took them from their homes, not Europeans.


When did the first African slaves make there way to America?

1619


Did African slaves make money?

No. A slave is owned by someone else. That is what makes them a slave and they are not paid for their labor. The Supreme Court decided they were property and had no rights. Slaves had to have permission to leave the plantation and didn't need money.


Why only Africans were slaves?

Africans were not the only enslaved in American history. Mostly Asian slaves built the railroad. Maybe even Irish. But anyway mostly africans were slaves because it just happened to be Africa that America decided to take people from and make them slaves because they were different. Thanks for the answer! Really helped


African slaves were brought to the Americas to supply labor for what?

African slaves were brought to America to work for free and make a profit for their masters. They were also used to entertain, amuse and do whatever their master commanded them to do.


What were the African slaves brought to the Americas to supply labor for?

African slaves were brought to America to work for free and make a profit for their masters. They were also used to entertain, amuse and do whatever their master commanded them to do.


Why south wanted to free slaves?

At the very end, they decided to put slaves in Confederate uniform and get them to fight for the South, but it was too late to make any difference.


Suppose that African nations decided to draw new borders What effect might this have on conflict?

If the African nations decided to draw new borders it would make some conflict worse because people are used to it being a certain way. It might help people learn to work together, but it could also cause more problems.


Why did people have to make more slaves?

people had no choice they were forced to have sex to create more slaves for there owners :(


Why do slave masters need to capture slaves?

Slave masters needed to catch more slaves to make more money. They sold slaves for money. Their wealth was decided by the number and quality of slaves they had in stock. Sometimes, if they had farms, the more slaves that worked on the farms, the better.