0
The experiment is unethical and probably would not be allowed by today's standards. The biggest problem is the use of deception, which the experiment relies on. The scientist lies to the test subject saying they will be assisting in a 'learning experiment' and that the shocks are genuine, when in actual fact the scientist is experimenting to see their reaction to the instructions.
The scientist also told them at the start that they are free to leave at any time, but once the voltages increased and the test subject was placed under pressure, the scientist would 'prod' them by saying "You have no choice...you MUST do it."
What else can I help you with?
Would the Milgram experiment have worked if the researchers had not used deception Why or why not?
The Milgram experiment likely would not have worked without deception because participants would have been less likely to follow the researcher's instructions to administer increasingly severe shocks if they were aware of the true nature of the study. Deception was used to create a situation where participants felt they had no choice but to follow orders, as they believed they were inflicting real harm.
What was the conclusion reached by Stanley Milgram in his teacher learner experiment?
Under orders, decent human beings will do anything. This experiment shows that people will obey authority figure even when there is no pre-existing relationship between the individual and the person of authority.
Do the insights gained from Milgram's research on obedience outweigh the elements of deception and stress that were forced on its subjects?
While Milgram's research on obedience provided important insights into human behavior, the use of deception and stress on subjects raises ethical concerns. It is essential to consider whether the benefits of the research justify the potential harm caused to participants, and to ensure that future studies prioritize informed consent and minimize harm.
How and why Milgram's research on obedience contributed to our understanding of human behaviour?
Milgram's research on obedience showed that ordinary people could be capable of committing harm to others under authority. This highlighted the power of situational influences on behavior, providing insights into how obedience to authority figures can override moral considerations. Overall, Milgram's work has had a lasting impact on our understanding of human behavior, particularly in terms of social influence and compliance.
Was milgram's study controversial?
Milgram's study was controversial for a number of reasons. It broke many ethical guidelines for methodolgy. These include: Deception - All of the participants in the study were deceived as to the real purpose and measures in place. Right to withdraw - If the participants hesitated, the experimenter did not reaffirm their right to withdraw. He instead used verbal prods to encourage the participants to continue. Participant safety - All the participants felt high levels of stress, and one even suffered convulsions. Even after the debriefing, the participants will have to live with the knowledge they would have killed someone. These have been opposed by the fact that the vast majority of participants said afterwards they were glad to have been involved with the experiment, and none of them experienced any long-term disturbance. It was also controversial for the result. The result suggests that perfectly normal people can do extremely evil things simply from orders. Mandel has suggested that this appears to lessen the responsibility of those involved. For instance, Adolf Eichman, who was involved in the holocaust, said in the Neuremberg trials that he was just following orders. Milgram's study would suggest that many NAZIs could just be normal people, even though they acted in a particularly evil fashion.
How do you write a hypothesis on milgram's experiment?
Stanley Milgram's experiment investigated the effect of authority on people's willingness to do unethical things, stemming from the experiences of the Holocaust. I think his hypothesis was that if people are pressured by a person of authority to do something, they will do it, even if it is against their moral code.
Why was the milgram experiment discontinued in the us?
The Milgram experiment was discontinued as it had a number of ethical issues. The most important one was potential harm to the participants. All participants suffered stress, and one even suffered convulsions. While 84% of participants said afterwards that they were glad to have taken part, that still means 16% were unsatisfied, and the major ethical concerns lead to the experiment not being continued.
What are the ethical concerns in milgrams study?
Some ethical concerns in Milgram's study include deception of participants about the true nature of the study, lack of fully informed consent, potential psychological harm to participants due to the stress and anxiety induced, and the lasting impact on their beliefs about authority figures and obedience. These raise questions about the balance between scientific advancement and the well-being of participants.
Would the Milgram experiment have worked if the researchers had not used deception Why or why not?
The Milgram experiment likely would not have worked without deception because participants would have been less likely to follow the researcher's instructions to administer increasingly severe shocks if they were aware of the true nature of the study. Deception was used to create a situation where participants felt they had no choice but to follow orders, as they believed they were inflicting real harm.
What challenges did Stanley milgram face?
Stanley Milgram faced criticism for the ethical implications of his obedience experiments, as they involved deception and psychological harm to participants. He also faced challenges in terms of the validity and generalizability of his findings, as some questioned the applicability of his results to real-life situations. Additionally, he had to navigate public backlash and controversy surrounding his research.
What is the most ethical reason for running a simulation rather than dumping actual oil into Lake Michigan?
an experiment should not cause any harm to the natural world *apex Kyah!
What was the conclusion reached by Stanley Milgram in his teacher learner experiment?
Under orders, decent human beings will do anything. This experiment shows that people will obey authority figure even when there is no pre-existing relationship between the individual and the person of authority.
Is there harm to the super senseable smells experiment?
no there is no harm is just a simple experiment of diffrent smells
How Based on the results of the Milgram Experiment do you think that individuals who compromise their own ethics in order to obey authority are responsible for the treatment of another if the authorit?
Individuals who compromise their own ethics to obey authority in the Milgram Experiment can be held responsible for the treatment of another because they ultimately chose to follow orders that caused harm. Despite the pressure from authority figures, individuals have the free will to question and resist unethical commands. By choosing to prioritize authority over their own moral compass, they contribute to the mistreatment of others.
What part of speech is the word traumatic?
The word "traumatic" is an adjective. It is used to describe experiences that cause severe emotional distress or psychological harm.
Can LSD cause damage?
LSD (assuming it is actually LSD and not another drug like DOM) is very unlikely to cause any physical harm (except from accidents/self-harm while on the drug), though it can negative psychological effects, with the incidence of this harm increasing with increasing doses and frequency of use.
What is an unethical experiment in psychology?
A classic example of an unethical experiment in psychology is the Stanford Prison Experiment conducted by Philip Zimbardo in 1971. In this study, college students were assigned the roles of guards and prisoners in a simulated prison environment, leading to psychological harm, abuse, and ethical violations due to the lack of appropriate safeguards in place to protect participants.
