yes As little more than a teenager, King Arthur unified a group of minor warring Kingdoms into a cohesive and cooperative "nation" working for the "mutual good" and to protect Britain from external threats.
King Arthur is a fictional character not a real one!
Well if king aruther died what do they have of him and the knight
King Arthur is a legendary king and did not exist.
The United Kingdom, King Arthur was supposed to be born in tintagel (England) whilst Merlin was ment to have originated from Wales. However King Arthur is ment to have united the kingdoms of Britain and so is a British ledgand
tournament to decing new king of england
No. There are no records of a King Arthur in England, certainly not in Anglo-Saxon England.
King Arthur
King Arthur is a fictional character not a real one!
He is from England
King Arthur did not become a knight. He was working for a knight and planning to become one, but he became king first. There was a contest once that Merlin held. Uther Pendragon was king but died. They had to decide who would be king of England so they put a magical sword in a stone. Whoever pulled it out was king of England and King Arthur did.
Well if king aruther died what do they have of him and the knight
England.
Well, it's a fact that King Arthur was an actual person, however, his power might have been exaggerated. But yes, the King of England did meet King Arthur.
Camelot
the ruler of England
That would depend on whether you believe king Arthur actually existed. His place in "history" is that of a legend, and if he did exist, he was King of only a small area of England.
To become King of England, Arthur had to pull the sword Excalibur from the stone. This was seen as a sign from the Lady of the Lake that he was the rightful king.