Best Answer

They believe that reasonable gun control measures must be taken. There is some debate as to what exactly is reasonable. Generally, this translates into support for various restrictions on gun ownership, such as magazine capacity limits, waiting periods, or outright bans on some types of guns or guns with certain features. This can, however, vary, since not all Democrats follow the party line exactly.

The official position We recognize that the right to bear arms is an important part of the American tradition, and we will preserve Americans' Second Amendment right to own and use firearms. We believe that the right to own firearms is subject to reasonable regulation, but we know that what works in Chicago may not work in Cheyenne. We can work together to enact and enforce commonsense laws and improvements - like closing the gun show loophole, improving our background check system, and reinstating the assault weapons ban, so that guns do not fall into the hands of terrorists or criminals. Acting responsibly and with respect for differing views on this issue, we can both protect the constitutional right to bear arms and keep our communities and our children safe.

The Democratic Party platform (2008)

Overall, the recent history of the Democratic party has been for stricter gun control, as the above plank from the 2008 Democratic Party platform indicates. Gun control is perhaps the second most contentious issue of the past several decades, with only abortion exceeding the heat of rhetoric flying about, so be careful with people talking in absolutes and sweeping generalizations.

With that in mind, here's a brief general overview of the types of gun control measures supported by various Democratic administrations, and local Democratic governors and city governments along with justifications provided for them:

  • Military-style weaponry has only one real purpose: killing people in large quantities. All such weapons should be banned, as the perceived potential for legal use is far outweighed by their potential for criminal use or for inadvertent harm even when used legally.
  • Local governments should have the power to regulate guns based on local conditions, with the presumption that not all firearms are banned
  • Guns have different characteristics, and the regulation/restriction on gun should be based on the unique characteristics of guns; in particular, the primary use (either intended or de facto) of a gun should be one of (if not the major) determining factor in regulation
  • The only ammunition that should be permissible is ammunition which is minimally needed for legal activities (personal/property defense, hunting, etc.). Ammunition which significantly exceeds the minimum performance requirements for legal use should be banned (under the assumption that this "excessive" performance appeals mostly to those engaging in illegal activities)
  • As a manufacturer of an intentionally lethal product, the manufacturer should be held liable if they act in a manner which is a de facto circumvention of existing regulation. That is, the actions of the manufacturer in the design, marketing and selling of their product should expose them to liability if those actions can be show to promote illegal use of their product.
  • Legal sales of firearms should be restricted to licensed merchants, who should be limited to sales of such goods at fixed locations (i.e. guns should be sold at stores, not at traveling shows). Transfer of gun ownership should be done at such establishments, where individual transfers can follow existing legal mechanisms for background checks, etc.
  • Ownership of a legal firearm should be restricted to those without a criminal background and who have no history of mental illness. Consequently, purchase of a gun should be accompanied by a thorough check of the individual, which may require a significant time period between the purchase of the gun, and the actual delivery of the product to the purchaser. In other words, the "waiting period" should be however long it takes to complete a thorough background check; as a corollary to this, the government should maintain a database listing unsuitable owners, which should be easily and quickly accessible to all gun merchants and law enforcement.
  • It is reasonable to restrict the total number of weapons sold to individuals (not registered gun merchants) to those which can reasonably be used by that individual. There should be no "right" to be a gun collector of an armory of fully functional weaponry. Gun collectors can register as gun merchants (and be regulated as such) if they so desire to maintain such a large collection.

Debate about this subject should be in the discussion section.

User Avatar

Wiki User

12y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar
More answers
User Avatar

Wiki User

11y ago

our democratic view of gun power is very uncomfortable and bad situation

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Wiki User

12y ago

Democrates generally want to take away guns. Note in a few cases they don't care or never get around to it.

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Wiki User

10y ago

they are against it

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Wiki User

12y ago

well most don't like the NRA!

This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: What is democratic view of gun control?
Write your answer...
Still have questions?
magnify glass
Related questions

Which party supports the gay rights and gun control?

The Democratic Party.

What ideological view supports gun control?

Liberal as a general rule

Why is the Democratic Party against the Second Amendment?

The Democratic Party is not against the Second Amendment, it is merely for gun control. The idea of gun control is that you shouldn't be allowed to own an AK, because the only reason to own an AK is to kill other people. Republicans usually charge that because Democrats are pro-gun control, that they are anti-second amendment, but those are two different things.

When was Union of Democratic Control created?

Union of Democratic Control was created in 1914.

A gun control debate when you are pro?

If you are "pro" in the gun control debate, you are for less gun control. In other words, you are "pro-gun".

What is the gun control amendment?

There is no "gun control" amendment.

What is a synonym for against?

opposing.Versus, contra, counter"I am against gun control" could also be phrased "I'm opposed to gun control", "I'm anti-gun control", "I'm an opponent of gun control", "I disagree with the idea of gun control"

What is the best title for an essay of gun control?

Gun Control

Does Italy have gun control?

They have gun laws. Whether they actually have the words "gun control" within any of their firearms legislature, I don't know, but they do have gun control.

Which ideological view might support this statement gun control is necessary?

You are asking for opinion- my opinion is that is a rather elitist point of view, that would indicate distrust of one's fellow citizens. Since criminals by definition are already ignoring laws that prohibit robbery, assault and theft, they are unlikely to obey laws regarding firearms. Gun control has its greatest effect on law abiding persons- your fellow citizens. The recurring theme of gun control has always been to "keep them out of the wrong hands". At different times, the "wrong hands" have been the hands of immigrants, native Americans, African Americans, poor people, and women. Do some reading on the history of the several thousand gun control laws in the US, and the failure of those laws in countries such as Canada, Great Britain, and Mexico. ************************ The ideological view that the use of guns is wrong might support the view that gun control is necessary. Since the USA has approximately 270,000,000 guns, the fact that as few as 22,000 people are killed with guns each year in the USA indicates a success of gun control laws and the necessity of extending their scope.

The Democratic Party and the Republican Party disagree on social issues like gun control and immigration. They also disagree on issues like how much money should be spent on welfare programs. Which of?

strict gun control laws, more money allocated for welfare programs, and more lenient laws on immigration

Was Ross Perot for gun control?

Yes, Ross Perot is for gun control. He was not a typical Conservative and was pro gun control and pro choice.