It can not always be decided who started the fight and it ends up causing more controversy...
*
Every person (including school children) have the legal right to defend themselves against bodily harm by using a reasonable means of force.
However, in doing so there are consequences that they will face from the school.
Most all schools have a no tolerence policy on fighting,This is because the school can not always determine who started the fight so both are punished equally..This may seem unfair however it avoids many problems that occured in the past before the no tolerence policy, most of which involved the parents of the students claiming the other student started the fight but did not get punished so the school lays blame to both students rather than just one...
So self defense is allowed but in doing so it has its own set consequences.
They should be shot on sight for self defense from assault.
Yes. No... Self defense training should be completely left to the parents not the public school system..Some parents may not agree with their child being taught how to fight,there could also be civil liability's with schools teaching self defense classes to children... Schools should teach students the basics of avoiding strangers and calling for help in certain situations and to avoid direct confrontation and get an adults help.. It should be up to the parents to decide when their child is mature enough to be taught self defense and then have them taught by a trained professional skilled in self defense and not huddled into a class and taught by the gym teacher who is not trained in such skills....
Your question is not well phrased. The law allows someone to kill to defend themselves, they nevertheless still have to prove such a circumstance. Should a person be allowed to kill in self-defense? That is a personal choice.
Violence is only allowed in self-defense, or to fight against oppression.
National Defense Academy, Pune, India Delhi Public Schools Both have their mottoes as "Service Before Self"
Self defense courses are becoming more popular. Often time community centers will offer free classes for the elderly. College campuses sometimes have courses for young women. There are also schools specifically for self defense classes much like martial arts dojos.
Self defense, sport, hunting, collecting.
self defense of tiger
Breaking someone's nose can certainly be termed as common assault. Self defense would be a defense to that charge. The jury would decide if self defense was justified. You should certainly consult an attorney.
Anyone can defend themselves by retaliating. The situation which is occurs could land the self-defender in jail if it is found that it was not actually in self-defense. Self-defense should be considered a last resort, only used if there is no other way to escape.
Yes, of course
In Islam, you are not allowed to kill anyone unless you are in a war, or if it is for self defense. And even in the wars, you are not allowed to hurt or kill the elderly, the woman, and the children.