0
How did scientist of Hellenistic times differ from scientists of Columbus's time in their thinking about the earth?
They did not. It is often thought that until Columbus' travels, people thought that the world was flat. But they didn't. Every medieval scientist and sailor knew that it was round. And it was the ancient Greek scientists that had not only already figured this out 2,500 years earlier, but they had - with astonishing precision - calculated the Earth's exact circumference and size. And both groups of scientists had more or less equal knowledge of the empires (and products) of the Far East. There had been extensive overland contact with them for thousands of years.
The only (small) difference was that to the ancient Greeks, the geography outside the Mediterranean world was little known, and to the scientist in Columbus' time, just a little more: the coasts of Africa had been explored and partially mapped by then. And the Portuguese knew how they had to navigate from there to get to India and China.
It was for that reason that the Portuguese refused to fund Columbus when he first approached them. They looked at his maps and calculations and decided that these estimated the size of the globe at less than 2/3rds of its real size - and that he therefore would never find India where he thought it would be.
Columbus by the way refused to ever acknowledge that he had discovered a 'new' continent. Until his dying day he maintained that he had discovered islands close to the coast of mainland India.
What else can I help you with?
How did scientists of Hellenistic times differ from scientists of Columbus's time in their thinking about earth?
Scientists of Hellenistic times believed the Earth was the center of the universe and that celestial bodies moved around it in perfect circular motion. In Columbus's time, scientists began to challenge this geocentric view, with Copernicus proposing a heliocentric model where the Earth orbits the Sun. This shift in thinking laid the foundation for the scientific revolution that followed.
What type of personal qualities does a environmental scientist?
Environmental scientists should possess strong analytical skills, attention to detail, critical thinking abilities, and a passion for environmental conservation. They should also have good communication skills to effectively convey complex information to a variety of audiences. Adaptability, patience, and a willingness to work collaboratively with others are also valuable traits in this field.
Why critical thinking is an important skull in evironmental science?
Critical thinking is important in environmental science because it allows researchers to assess information, identify biases, and make informed decisions. It helps in analyzing complex environmental issues, evaluating potential solutions, and understanding the implications of these decisions on natural ecosystems and human communities. By applying critical thinking skills, scientists can effectively address environmental challenges and work towards sustainable solutions.
What skills do scientists use to test how water behaves?
Scientists use a variety of skills to test how water behaves, including experimental design, data collection and analysis, critical thinking, and observation. They may use techniques such as measuring surface tension, viscosity, pH levels, conductivity, and temperature to study water behavior in different conditions. Additionally, scientists also utilize technologies like microscopes and spectrometers to explore water properties at a molecular level.
Why is critical thinking important in environmental science?
Critical thinking is important in environmental science because it helps scientists analyze complex environmental issues, evaluate evidence, and make informed decisions. It allows for a deeper understanding of environmental problems, the ability to identify potential solutions, and the capacity to communicate findings effectively to policymakers and the public. Ultimately, critical thinking in environmental science is essential for promoting sustainable practices and addressing global environmental challenges.
How did scientists of Hellenistic times differ from scientists of Columbus's time in their thinking about earth?
Scientists of Hellenistic times believed the Earth was the center of the universe and that celestial bodies moved around it in perfect circular motion. In Columbus's time, scientists began to challenge this geocentric view, with Copernicus proposing a heliocentric model where the Earth orbits the Sun. This shift in thinking laid the foundation for the scientific revolution that followed.
How scientists and engineers work together on environmental issues?
Scientists work together in a way with engineers by thinking the solution and the engineers execute it so basically the scientist thinks it the engineer does it.But some times the ideas of scientists are so weird that they become hard for the engineers to do.
Why do scientists gather as much information as possible about the other planets?
My thinking is that scientist are trying to bring life in another other planet just in case our planet run out of resources.
Is there a scientist in Narnia?
There is no scientist in Narnia, but you may be thinking or Professor Kirke.
How are scientists creative?
because they need to be able to think outside the box otherwise they will have trouble as a scientist. thinking outside of the box is part of there job. If they don't be creative then they can't come up with real scientist ideas.
Who is the greates scientist in the world and way?
This is an opinion question, it's all what you think. There is no one best scientist. I'm not going to blow up on why you asked that, so here are some scientists to consider thinking are the best; Aristotle, Socrates, Albert Einstein, Benjamin Franklin….
What are the six skills necessary to think like a scientist?
While I am sure that some sociological discussion of scientists has led someone to produce a list of traits or skills that a scientist must have, there is certainly no fixed and reliable list where you can enumerate skills. There is perhaps one skill that would be broadly agreed upon and that is a skill in critical thinking. By critical thinking, one means essentially being sure of what you know and being able to put together the reliable implications of what you know, while recognizing that there are potentially relevant factors that you may not know. Wikipedia has a nice entry on critical thinking. And, one last comment, critical thinking may be required of a scientist but it is not limited to scientists. Presumably this is a valuable skill for anyone.
What are the qualities of scientist?
Scientists typically possess qualities such as curiosity, critical thinking skills, persistence, and attention to detail. They are also usually analytical, open-minded, and have a passion for discovery and learning.
What are the traits of scientists?
Scientists are known for their studies and knowledge about the physical sciences. Curious, objective, creative, open minded, rational and focused are the traits that a typical scientist must have.
What make scientist think that the ozone layer is disappearing?
Scientists believe that the ozone layer is disappearing because there is a large hole in it. This hole was not there years ago.
What is a scientist open-mindedness balanced by?
A scientist's open-mindedness is balanced by critical thinking and skepticism. This involves questioning results, seeking alternative explanations, and scrutinizing evidence before drawing conclusions. By maintaining this balance, scientists are able to remain objective and uphold the integrity of the scientific process.
Characteristic of a scientist?
positive thinking
