the earth would be incomplete
If you were to remove the Earth's crust, you would expose the layer underneath, with is the mantle. The mantle is composed of hot, liquid rock called magma. However, if the magma were to be exposed by the removal of the crust, it would just form another crust. The surface would cool, by radiating energy into space.
cuz why not
I believe this would be the oceanic crust
there would be more earthquakes and more volcanic eruptions
Between mantle and crust
Other orbiting bodies contain more iron then earths crust does
The average is 9 miles.The average continental crust thickness is 22 miles thick. The maximum crust thickness is 56 miles underneath the Himalayas, and is 16 miles thick at its thinnest in various places.The average oceanic crust is about 4 miles thick.For the entire Earth then, the average crust thickness is 9 miles.To scale size, the earths crust would be about the thickness of 3 ordinary sheets of paper on a basketball. The thickness of a chicken eggshell would be 16 pieces of paper on a basketball, so the earths crust is 5 times thinner than a typical egg shell. And the crust is only as thick as the egg shell at its maximum thickness underneath Nepal.Sleep tight.
oceanic crust
Earth's crust would be silica. Living things would be carbon.
Those would be tectonic plates.
I believe this would be the oceanic crust
The surface.
I would say Japan because it is separated into four pieces of the earths crust. in Tokyo Very small earthquakes happen every day
ambot lang
ambot lang
They weld together into new continental crust.
We would die and crumble and have a cooled crust and we'd die
suma sa kandinq nqa banqs !
suma sa kandinq nqa banqs !