0
Want this question answered?
Be notified when an answer is posted
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Can a person have an absolute advantage in two tasks and a comparative advantage in only one?
no
Difference between comparative cost advantage and absolute cost advantage?
Absolute advantage and comparative advantage are two basic concepts to international trade. Under absolute advantage, one country can produce more output per unit of productive input than another. With comparative advantage, if one country has an absolute (dis)advantage in every type of output, the other might benefit from specializing in and exporting those products, if any exist.A country has an absolute advantage economically over another, in a particular good, when it can produce that good at a lower cost. Using the same input of resources a country with an absolute advantage will have greater output. Assuming this one good is the only item in the market, beneficial trade is impossible. An absolute advantage is one where trade is not mutually beneficial, as opposed to a comparative advantage where trade is mutually beneficial.A country has a comparative advantage in the production of a good if it can produce that good at a lower opportunity cost relative to another country. The theory of comparative advantage explains why it can be beneficial for two parties (countries, regions, individuals and so on) to trade if one has a lower relative cost of producing some good. What matters is not the absolute cost of production but the opportunity cost, which measures how much production of one good, is reduced to produce one more unit of the other good.
What is the absolute advantage of trade in Philippine economy?
An absolute advantage is when trading only occurs between one or two parties. This is common in the Philippine economy since most industries are monopolistic.
Vintland an Moonited republic has 30 and 20 million hours of labor per yearVintland has 15 labor hours per bottle of wine and moonited republic has 10 hoursWhich country has absolute advantage?
Moonited Republic has absolute advantage, because it needs only 10 labor hours to produce one bottle of wine while Vintland needs 15 labor hours.
Is absolute advantage or comparative advantage more important?
Comparative advantage. Because a lower opportunity cost(comparative advantage) means a producer use the resource more efficint to produce what people want the most whereas absolute advantage only consider the number of goods or services being produced. Though a producer have a absolute advantage, but he or she may use the resource inefficiently, which will cause a disadvantge in the confront with scarcity. If we assign jobs according to comparative advantage, all individuals may benefit if the assignments are well specialized or the products are well exchanged. The resoure is limited, so only specialize each individual accroding to comparative advantage could lead to more total production.
Can a person have an absolute advantage in two tasks and a comparative advantage in only one?
no
Difference between comparative cost advantage and absolute cost advantage?
Absolute advantage and comparative advantage are two basic concepts to international trade. Under absolute advantage, one country can produce more output per unit of productive input than another. With comparative advantage, if one country has an absolute (dis)advantage in every type of output, the other might benefit from specializing in and exporting those products, if any exist.A country has an absolute advantage economically over another, in a particular good, when it can produce that good at a lower cost. Using the same input of resources a country with an absolute advantage will have greater output. Assuming this one good is the only item in the market, beneficial trade is impossible. An absolute advantage is one where trade is not mutually beneficial, as opposed to a comparative advantage where trade is mutually beneficial.A country has a comparative advantage in the production of a good if it can produce that good at a lower opportunity cost relative to another country. The theory of comparative advantage explains why it can be beneficial for two parties (countries, regions, individuals and so on) to trade if one has a lower relative cost of producing some good. What matters is not the absolute cost of production but the opportunity cost, which measures how much production of one good, is reduced to produce one more unit of the other good.
What is the difference between theory of absolute advantage and a theory of comparative advantage?
The theory of absolute advantage states that a country should produce goods that it can produce more efficiently than other countries. On the other hand, the theory of comparative advantage argues that a country should specialize in producing goods that it can produce at a lower opportunity cost compared to other countries, even if it does not have an absolute advantage in that good.
What is the absolute advantage of trade in Philippine economy?
An absolute advantage is when trading only occurs between one or two parties. This is common in the Philippine economy since most industries are monopolistic.
Vintland an Moonited republic has 30 and 20 million hours of labor per yearVintland has 15 labor hours per bottle of wine and moonited republic has 10 hoursWhich country has absolute advantage?
Moonited Republic has absolute advantage, because it needs only 10 labor hours to produce one bottle of wine while Vintland needs 15 labor hours.
Is absolute advantage or comparative advantage more important?
Comparative advantage. Because a lower opportunity cost(comparative advantage) means a producer use the resource more efficint to produce what people want the most whereas absolute advantage only consider the number of goods or services being produced. Though a producer have a absolute advantage, but he or she may use the resource inefficiently, which will cause a disadvantge in the confront with scarcity. If we assign jobs according to comparative advantage, all individuals may benefit if the assignments are well specialized or the products are well exchanged. The resoure is limited, so only specialize each individual accroding to comparative advantage could lead to more total production.
Reasons for entering international markets?
There are 2 reasons for entering the international market or trade. 1.Absolute advantage :nations have an absolute advantage in proudcing goods. For example the US will produce 150 of x and 200 of Y and the EU will only produce 100 of x and 150 of Y. Here the USA produces more of both goods and has an absolute advantage. 2.Comparative advantage :This is when nations can produce a good with a smaller opertunity cost in comparrisant to its trade rivals.
Can there be trade between two nation even if one has absolute disadvantage?
Yes, and not only that, but such trade can be profitable for both countries due to comparative advantage.
What is unique about Vatican City?
The Vatican is the smallest independent country in the world and the only absolute monarchy in Europe.
Two countries can achieve gains from trade even if one of the countries has an absolute advantage in the production of all goods?
true，if only one has comparative advantages.
What country is only one square mile in area?
me
Examples of absolute and comparative advantage?
Absolute advantage: Vietnam can produce 1000 million tons of rice while South Korea can produce 800 million tons of rice => Vietnam has absolute advantage (since it can produce more than Korea) Comparative advantage: Same example: Vietnam and Korea. To produce 1 more tonnes of rice, Vietnam has to give up producing 3 cars. However, to produce 1 more tonnes of rice, South Korea only have to give up producing 1 cars. => There is a lower opportuniy cost for Korea to produce rice. i.e. South Korea has the comparative advantage.
