0
What else can I help you with?
Can a person have an absolute advantage in two tasks and a comparative advantage in only one?
no
Difference between comparative cost advantage and absolute cost advantage?
Absolute advantage and comparative advantage are two basic concepts to international trade. Under absolute advantage, one country can produce more output per unit of productive input than another. With comparative advantage, if one country has an absolute (dis)advantage in every type of output, the other might benefit from specializing in and exporting those products, if any exist.A country has an absolute advantage economically over another, in a particular good, when it can produce that good at a lower cost. Using the same input of resources a country with an absolute advantage will have greater output. Assuming this one good is the only item in the market, beneficial trade is impossible. An absolute advantage is one where trade is not mutually beneficial, as opposed to a comparative advantage where trade is mutually beneficial.A country has a comparative advantage in the production of a good if it can produce that good at a lower opportunity cost relative to another country. The theory of comparative advantage explains why it can be beneficial for two parties (countries, regions, individuals and so on) to trade if one has a lower relative cost of producing some good. What matters is not the absolute cost of production but the opportunity cost, which measures how much production of one good, is reduced to produce one more unit of the other good.
What is the absolute advantage of trade in Philippine economy?
An absolute advantage is when trading only occurs between one or two parties. This is common in the Philippine economy since most industries are monopolistic.
Is absolute advantage or comparative advantage more important?
Comparative advantage. Because a lower opportunity cost(comparative advantage) means a producer use the resource more efficint to produce what people want the most whereas absolute advantage only consider the number of goods or services being produced. Though a producer have a absolute advantage, but he or she may use the resource inefficiently, which will cause a disadvantge in the confront with scarcity. If we assign jobs according to comparative advantage, all individuals may benefit if the assignments are well specialized or the products are well exchanged. The resoure is limited, so only specialize each individual accroding to comparative advantage could lead to more total production.
Can there be trade between two nation even if one has absolute disadvantage?
Yes, and not only that, but such trade can be profitable for both countries due to comparative advantage.
Can a person have an absolute advantage in two tasks and a comparative advantage in only one?
no
Difference between comparative cost advantage and absolute cost advantage?
Absolute advantage and comparative advantage are two basic concepts to international trade. Under absolute advantage, one country can produce more output per unit of productive input than another. With comparative advantage, if one country has an absolute (dis)advantage in every type of output, the other might benefit from specializing in and exporting those products, if any exist.A country has an absolute advantage economically over another, in a particular good, when it can produce that good at a lower cost. Using the same input of resources a country with an absolute advantage will have greater output. Assuming this one good is the only item in the market, beneficial trade is impossible. An absolute advantage is one where trade is not mutually beneficial, as opposed to a comparative advantage where trade is mutually beneficial.A country has a comparative advantage in the production of a good if it can produce that good at a lower opportunity cost relative to another country. The theory of comparative advantage explains why it can be beneficial for two parties (countries, regions, individuals and so on) to trade if one has a lower relative cost of producing some good. What matters is not the absolute cost of production but the opportunity cost, which measures how much production of one good, is reduced to produce one more unit of the other good.
What is the difference between theory of absolute advantage and a theory of comparative advantage?
Those theories both refer to international trade, however absolute advantage was mentioned earlier. According to it, a trade between 2 countries is possible only if one has absolute advantage (produces a good with less costs or with less time) and other has absolute disadvantage in producing that good but at the same time it must have an absolute advantage in producing the secong good. If a country produces a good better (cheaper/faster), it would specialize on it and export. Theory assumes that only 2 counties and 2 goods exist, no other costs except for labour are taken into account.
What is the absolute advantage of trade in Philippine economy?
An absolute advantage is when trading only occurs between one or two parties. This is common in the Philippine economy since most industries are monopolistic.
Is absolute advantage or comparative advantage more important?
Comparative advantage. Because a lower opportunity cost(comparative advantage) means a producer use the resource more efficint to produce what people want the most whereas absolute advantage only consider the number of goods or services being produced. Though a producer have a absolute advantage, but he or she may use the resource inefficiently, which will cause a disadvantge in the confront with scarcity. If we assign jobs according to comparative advantage, all individuals may benefit if the assignments are well specialized or the products are well exchanged. The resoure is limited, so only specialize each individual accroding to comparative advantage could lead to more total production.
Reasons for entering international markets?
There are 2 reasons for entering the international market or trade. 1.Absolute advantage :nations have an absolute advantage in proudcing goods. For example the US will produce 150 of x and 200 of Y and the EU will only produce 100 of x and 150 of Y. Here the USA produces more of both goods and has an absolute advantage. 2.Comparative advantage :This is when nations can produce a good with a smaller opertunity cost in comparrisant to its trade rivals.
What is unique about Vatican City?
The Vatican is the smallest independent country in the world and the only absolute monarchy in Europe.
Can there be trade between two nation even if one has absolute disadvantage?
Yes, and not only that, but such trade can be profitable for both countries due to comparative advantage.
Two countries can achieve gains from trade even if one of the countries has an absolute advantage in the production of all goods?
true，if only one has comparative advantages.
Examples of absolute and comparative advantage?
Absolute advantage: Vietnam can produce 1000 million tons of rice while South Korea can produce 800 million tons of rice => Vietnam has absolute advantage (since it can produce more than Korea) Comparative advantage: Same example: Vietnam and Korea. To produce 1 more tonnes of rice, Vietnam has to give up producing 3 cars. However, to produce 1 more tonnes of rice, South Korea only have to give up producing 1 cars. => There is a lower opportuniy cost for Korea to produce rice. i.e. South Korea has the comparative advantage.
What are the advantages of Louis XVI as an absolute monarch?
The main advantage of absolute monarchy is order. By concentrating all power in one person, absolute monarchy permits an unprecedented level of order and control over the various regions of the state. Unfortunately, then, the quality of the government is heavily dependent on the quality of the one person ruling it and Louis XVI was not a good politician, nor did he care for politics. The only advantage for Louis XVI, personally, was that he was preserving the old status quo.
What is they only country that is also continent?
Australia is a country as well as a continent.
