0
What else can I help you with?
Many organizations have established policies to remedy discrimination in hiring of women and minorities Discuss whether or not you feel that affirmative action programs reverse discrimination and crit?
Answer I believe that the affirmative action programs doin fact reverse discrimination. It voilates the equal protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment as well as Title VI of the Civil Rights Act. We need to get rid of all of these "legal" forms of favoritism. How on earth can it be equal if colleges are reserving spots for minorities and women over white men who are more qualified? (Not saying that all white men are more qualified, you know what I mean here.)
What is Opportunity cost determined by?
The opportunity cost of doing action A is not doing action B. So, the opportunity cost theoretically depends upon how much you value action A over action B (ie, value of action A - value of action B).
What following states has a court of equity established more than 200 years ago that hears disputes over the internal affairs of corporations?
Delaware
Can the buyer refuse to hand over the goods upon collection?
Yes, a buyer can refuse to hand over the goods upon collection under certain circumstances, such as if the goods are defective, not as described, or if the seller has not fulfilled their contractual obligations. However, the buyer should be aware of their legal rights and obligations in such situations. It's advisable for both parties to communicate openly to resolve any disputes amicably. If necessary, legal action may be pursued to enforce the contract.
What are some of the lawsuits against the target corporation?
Target Corporation has faced various lawsuits over the years, including class-action suits related to data breaches, such as the 2013 incident where hackers accessed credit card information of millions of customers. Additionally, the company has been involved in legal disputes over employment practices, including allegations of wage theft and discrimination. There have also been lawsuits concerning safety issues related to their store environments and product liability claims. These cases highlight the legal challenges large retailers often encounter in their operations.
Why did it succeed implementation of affirmative action in America?
The 'why did it succeed' within this question is not clear. The affirmative action was to have women, minorities, and children, involved in employment opportunities, contracting decisions, and education. The affirmative action in America has changed many lives for the good, however, it has also upset many due to the feeling of special treatment towards the minorities or women over the more qualified individuals.
WHO Was the first to propose that you might need affirmative action for men?
The first person to propose the concept of affirmative action for men was Warren Farrell, an American educator and author. In the early 1990s, Farrell suggested in his book "The Myth of Male Power" that men, too, could benefit from affirmative action policies to address disparities in areas such as education and employment. He argued that gender-based affirmative action could help men who faced discrimination or disadvantages in certain contexts.
What was the main issue in the debate over affirmative action?
The main issue in the debate over affirmative action revolves around the balance between promoting diversity and addressing historical inequalities versus ensuring equal treatment and opportunities for all individuals, regardless of race or background. Proponents argue that affirmative action helps rectify systemic discrimination and creates a more inclusive society, while opponents contend that it can lead to reverse discrimination and undermine meritocracy. This tension highlights broader societal questions about fairness, equity, and the role of government in addressing social injustices.
Which os an argument against affirmative action?
One argument against affirmative action is that it can lead to reverse discrimination, where individuals from historically privileged groups are disadvantaged in favor of underrepresented groups, potentially leading to feelings of resentment and division. Critics argue that it undermines meritocracy by prioritizing race or gender over qualifications, which can result in less qualified candidates being chosen for opportunities. Additionally, opponents claim that affirmative action may perpetuate stereotypes by implying that certain groups cannot succeed without extra assistance.
What are three negative effects of affirmative action in policing?
Three negative effects of affirmative action in policing include potential concerns over lowered standards for recruitment, which may compromise the effectiveness and competency of the police force. It can also lead to resentment among officers and the public if individuals feel that promotions or hiring decisions are based more on demographic factors than merit. Additionally, affirmative action might create a perception of tokenism, undermining the trust and respect that diverse officers seek to build within the communities they serve.
Is the affirmative action policy morally defensible Explain?
The affirmative action policy is also known as positive discrimination and dictates that a certain number of jobs, school vacancies, etc. must be filled by people of a certain criteria, such as the aged, poor, women, minorities, etc. This policy is not morally justifiable, because by holding organizations to those quotas, they could be favoring unqualified individuals over people who actually deserve the openings.
How is race-based gerrymandering related to affirmative action?
Race-based gerrymandering and affirmative action both address issues of racial inequality and representation, but they do so in different contexts. Gerrymandering involves manipulating electoral district boundaries to favor one racial group over another, often diluting the voting power of minorities. In contrast, affirmative action aims to improve opportunities for historically marginalized groups in education and employment. Both practices seek to address systemic inequities, but they highlight the complexities and challenges of achieving fair representation and equality in society.
Which program or law that was designed to address the effects of past discrimination is constitutional but still extremely controversial?
Affirmative Action is a program that was designed to address past discrimination by promoting the inclusion of individuals from marginalized groups in employment or education. It is constitutional but remains controversial due to concerns over reverse discrimination and fairness in the selection process.
Why is affirmative action policy not morally defensible?
The affirmative action policy is also known as positive discrimination and dictates that a certain number of jobs, school vacancies, etc. must be filled by people of a certain criteria, such as the aged, poor, women, minorities, etc. This policy is not morally justifiable, because by holding organizations to those quotas, they could be favoring unqualified individuals over people who actually deserve the openings.
Which party fell apart largely over disputes about slavery?
which party fell apart largely over disputes about slavery?
What did harriet demonstrate over and over again?
no
What is an argument against affirmative action?
An argument against affirmative action is that it can lead to reverse discrimination, where individuals from historically advantaged groups may be unfairly overlooked in favor of less qualified candidates solely based on their race or gender. Critics argue that this approach undermines the principle of meritocracy by prioritizing demographic characteristics over individual achievements and qualifications. Additionally, it may foster resentment and division rather than promoting genuine equality and social cohesion.
