By no means. Many scientific discoveries, particularly in fields of zoology and botany rely on the discoveries and observations of local natives. Case in point; Chimpanzee activists in Tanzania tried to educate local children about the chimps in the area by showing them pictures. The kids responded in terror, saying they steal and eat babies. The kids were right, but this flew in the face of what scientists believed at the time.
science is made up of 3 ( three ) things, physics, biology and chemistry
YES
Well as you go, science develops new conclusions and you cannot expect to have every discovery in the books to be set out and done by now. Science, often corrects its self as new discoveries are made, and as we enter life, century's and century's will pass and new scientific discoveries will begin to comprehend, many scientists are corrected by other scientists, however most would try to conclude the experiment quickly, and avoid having the flaws/mistakes pointed out, .just to slip away from the embarrassment. I mean, who knows maybe a century later when we are all dead, gravity may not be the thing that holds us down anymore. Always expect the unexpected.
It is a relationship with a benefit for both fields. The more scientific discoveries are made, the more they can use those discoveries to improve technology. The more technological advancements are made, the more they can use those advancements to make new scientific discoveries. In other words, technology is the application of science in the world around us.
The media does not make positive contribution to public science. The only positive contribution to science is the Nova channel, Discovery channel, PBS, and science educational programs. The media does not talk about science because news caste anchors are not scientists. And scientists are not new caste anchors. Do not confuse the two as being the same art. News caste anchors only regurgitate news with no aspirations of science and it's wonderful discoveries. On the flip side of this topic, when discoveries are made they do talk about them very briefly because discoveries take time to be discovered.Maybe you should be a news caste anchor scientists. That way you could be passionate about discoveriesA2. The above material is very true, but the answer is in the hands of the scientists. In my local newspaper, there would be less than 1/4 page of science information from contributors each week. Compared with a couple of pages of arts, a dozen pages of sports, 4 pages of horse racing, and so on.From personal experience I know that the editors will do their best to publish any material they receive. The fault lies with the science folk failing to contribute.Scientists are ill educated in methods of communication, particularly those of the 'media'.
science is made up of 3 ( three ) things, physics, biology and chemistry
idk
YES
1931 science discoveries
Mary and Louis Leakey..... :)
Yes, new knowledge and discoveries are constantly expanding our understanding of the world. Scientists, researchers, and scholars are always advancing their fields through experimentation, observation, and analysis, leading to breakthroughs and new insights. This ongoing pursuit of knowledge drives progress and innovation in all areas of study.
Black holes
All scientists yearly salaries are different from one another. Scientists who have made big discoveries have larger salaries than those who have not.
No, modern scientists do not understand everything about the world. There are still many mysteries and unanswered questions in various fields of science that researchers are actively working to uncover. Scientific knowledge is constantly evolving and expanding as new discoveries are made.
Increasing government funding of research
Increasing government funding of research
Increasing government funding of research