0
What else can I help you with?
Is YouTube a valid source?
YouTube can definitely be a valid source depending on the channel and what you're looking for. For instance, many companies and organizations do use YouTube to make announcements and various other videos. In fact, the U.S. Governement also has a YouTube account, which would probably mean that YouTube has at least a couple of credible sources.
What is the discussion for experiment measurement and uncertainty?
I'm not sure what you're asking here. Are you talking about validity?.. And if the measurements you have provided are valid?.. Or Reliability.. If the measurements you have gotten are reliable as you can check them with another source and you get the same answer?
Is it true a scientists opinion is a valid source of information to use in a scientific investigation?
Yes, a scientist's opinion can be a valid source of information in a scientific investigation, especially if the scientist has expertise in the relevant field. Their insights can provide valuable context, interpretations of data, or hypotheses. However, it's essential to complement such opinions with empirical evidence and peer-reviewed research to ensure a well-rounded and credible investigation. Relying solely on personal opinions without supporting data may lead to biased conclusions.
Does scientific method have to be controlled in order to be valid?
No, the scientific method can be uncontrolled to for it to be valid.
What is a valid investigation?
a valid investigation is an effective investigation i think. The results turn out to be what you had inferred.
Is 0.0.0.0 valid ip address.give reason for your answer?
It is valid but it is reserved as a source address only by RFC1700 standard.
When you evaluate a source you should?
Always check another source to make sure what is being presented is accurate and valid.
Is wikianswers a valid source?
That depends on who answers the question and how well they support their answer.
Is Emptyjava file a valid source file?
It depends on its content, obviously.
What is A valid source is one that?
A valid source is one that is credible, reliable, and trustworthy, often supported by evidence or expert opinion. It typically comes from reputable publications, academic institutions, or recognized authorities in the field. Additionally, a valid source should provide accurate information that is relevant to the topic at hand and is free from bias or misinformation. Evaluating the author's credentials and the source's publication date can also help determine its validity.
On the stock market who are the people that can trade stocks?
Any citizen of a country who is above 18 years of age, has a valid source of income and tax payer ID can trade in stocks. People without valid Tax payer ID or a valid source of income will not be allowed to trade in the stock market.
Is filenametxt a valid name for a c source?
Any valid file name is a valid name for a C source file. The extension itself is immaterial; it is part of the file name and only serves as a means of organising files. The extensions .c and .h are merely a convention. You don't have to use them if you don't want to, but it makes sense to stick to the recognised conventions, particularly if you intend to distribute your source.
What is most important for the writer of a research report to determine about a source?
How valid the source is and if it will help the researcher prove their thesis by adding it into the research they are presenting.
What is most important about a writer of a research report determine about a source?
How valid the source is and if it will help the researcher prove their thesis by adding it into the research they are presenting.
What is most important for a writer of a research report determine about a source?
How valid the source is and if it will help the researcher prove their thesis by adding it into the research they are presenting.
What is most important for a writer of a research report to determine about a source?
How valid the source is and if it will help the researcher prove their thesis by adding it into the research they are presenting.
Suppose that you are trying to determine whether a secondary source is valid. What information about the source's creator would be most helpful to you?
Answer this question… The author's area of expertise
