answersLogoWhite

0

A source is considered valid if it has these qualities:

1. It is not any type of forum

2. Answers cannot be modified by the public

3. It is not a personal website

A lot of people look at Wikipedia, YahooAnswers, and even this site as invalid sources.

User Avatar

Wiki User

13y ago

What else can I help you with?

Related Questions

Is 0.0.0.0 valid ip address.give reason for your answer?

It is valid but it is reserved as a source address only by RFC1700 standard.


Is wikianswers a valid source?

That depends on who answers the question and how well they support their answer.


Is Emptyjava file a valid source file?

It depends on its content, obviously.


When you evaluate a source you should?

Always check another source to make sure what is being presented is accurate and valid.


What is A valid source is one that?

A valid source is one that is credible, reliable, and trustworthy, often supported by evidence or expert opinion. It typically comes from reputable publications, academic institutions, or recognized authorities in the field. Additionally, a valid source should provide accurate information that is relevant to the topic at hand and is free from bias or misinformation. Evaluating the author's credentials and the source's publication date can also help determine its validity.


On the stock market who are the people that can trade stocks?

Any citizen of a country who is above 18 years of age, has a valid source of income and tax payer ID can trade in stocks. People without valid Tax payer ID or a valid source of income will not be allowed to trade in the stock market.


Is filenametxt a valid name for a c source?

Any valid file name is a valid name for a C source file. The extension itself is immaterial; it is part of the file name and only serves as a means of organising files. The extensions .c and .h are merely a convention. You don't have to use them if you don't want to, but it makes sense to stick to the recognised conventions, particularly if you intend to distribute your source.


What is most important for the writer of a research report to determine about a source?

How valid the source is and if it will help the researcher prove their thesis by adding it into the research they are presenting.


What is most important about a writer of a research report determine about a source?

How valid the source is and if it will help the researcher prove their thesis by adding it into the research they are presenting.


What is most important for a writer of a research report determine about a source?

How valid the source is and if it will help the researcher prove their thesis by adding it into the research they are presenting.


What is most important for a writer of a research report to determine about a source?

How valid the source is and if it will help the researcher prove their thesis by adding it into the research they are presenting.


Suppose that you are trying to determine whether a secondary source is valid. What information about the source's creator would be most helpful to you?

Answer this question… The author's area of expertise