If data from repeated experiments do not support the hypothesis, the scientist should re-evaluate the hypothesis to determine if it needs to be revised or discarded. They may also analyze the experimental design and methods to check for potential errors or biases. Additionally, the scientist might consider conducting further experiments or exploring alternative hypotheses that could better explain the observed results. Ultimately, this iterative process is crucial for advancing scientific understanding.
After forming a hypothesis, a scientist is most likely to conduct experiments to test the hypothesis. This involves designing a controlled experiment to gather data and observations that will either support or refute the hypothesis. Following the experiments, the scientist analyzes the results to draw conclusions and may refine the hypothesis or develop further experiments based on the findings.
After forming a hypothesis, the next step in the scientific method is to conduct experiments to test the hypothesis. This involves designing an experiment, collecting data, and observing the outcomes to determine if they support or refute the hypothesis. The results of these experiments will then inform further analysis and conclusions.
when results from the experiments repeatedly fail to support the hypothesis.
It would become a theory. Then different predictions would need to be made to test other parts of it.
You obtain objective evidence to support it by undertaking experiments designed to test the veracity of the hypothesis.
When the evidence in a scientific experiment does not support the hypothesis the scientist:Confirm through repeated experimentation that the evidence is validReject the hypothesisDevelop another hypothesis that is consistent with the valid evidence
After forming a hypothesis, a scientist is most likely to conduct experiments to test the hypothesis. This involves designing a controlled experiment to gather data and observations that will either support or refute the hypothesis. Following the experiments, the scientist analyzes the results to draw conclusions and may refine the hypothesis or develop further experiments based on the findings.
After forming a hypothesis, the next step in the scientific method is to conduct experiments to test the hypothesis. This involves designing an experiment, collecting data, and observing the outcomes to determine if they support or refute the hypothesis. The results of these experiments will then inform further analysis and conclusions.
a scientist can do another experiment or change their hypothesis.
when results from the experiments repeatedly fail to support the hypothesis.
It would become a theory. Then different predictions would need to be made to test other parts of it.
Discard or change the hypothesis.
That its wrong (false).
You obtain objective evidence to support it by undertaking experiments designed to test the veracity of the hypothesis.
The results of his experiments did not support his hypothesis.
After forming a hypothesis, a scientist is most likely to design and conduct experiments to test the hypothesis. This involves collecting data and making observations to determine whether the results support or refute the hypothesis. Based on the findings, the scientist may then analyze the data and draw conclusions, which could lead to further experimentation or the modification of the hypothesis.
A scientist uses the "analysis" step of the scientific method to determine whether the hypothesis was supported. During this phase, they evaluate the data collected from experiments to see if it aligns with the predictions made by the hypothesis. If the results support the hypothesis, it can be accepted; if not, the hypothesis may be rejected or revised. This analysis ultimately leads to drawing conclusions about the validity of the hypothesis.