0
What else can I help you with?
Is phlogiston considered a scientific knowledge?
No. Phlogiston was a theory considered to be fact and actually hindered scientific knowledge until it was discredited. The theory was used to explain certain observations about flame, oxidation, and the formation of certain compounds, most noticeably cinnabar. As with some theories, phlogiston used variable factors to explain anomalies. For instance it was assumed to have negative weight under certain circumstances. Once oxidation was properly understood phlogiston theory was no longer considered true.
What is the phlogiston?
The alchemist and physician J. J. Becher proposed the phlogiston theoryThe phlogiston theory (from the Ancient Greek φλογιστόν phlogistón "burning up", from φλόξ phlóx "flame"), first stated in 1667 by Johann Joachim Becher, is an obsolete scientific theory that postulated the existence of a fire-like element called "phlogiston", which was contained within combustible bodies and released during combustion. The theory was an attempt to explain processes of burning such as combustion and the rusting of metals, which are now collectively known as oxidation.
Stahl and Becher major contributions to the field of chemistry?
They proposed the Phlogiston Theory.
Why was the pholgiston theory thought to be incorrect?
The theory holds that all flammable materials contain phlogiston, a substance without color, odor, taste, or mass that is liberated in burning. Once burned, the "dephlogisticated" substance was held to be in its "true" form, the calx."Phlogisticated" substances are those that contain phlogiston and are "dephlogisticated" when burned; "in general, substances that burned in air were said to be rich in phlogiston; the fact that combustion soon ceased in an enclosed space was taken as clear-cut evidence that air had the capacity to absorb only a definite amount of phlogiston. When air had become completely phlogisticated it would no longer serve to support combustion of any material, nor would a metal heated in it yield a calx; nor could phlogisticated air support life, for the role of air in respiration was to remove the phlogiston from the body."[4] Thus, phlogiston as first conceived was a sort of anti-oxygen.Joseph Black's student Daniel Rutherford discovered nitrogen in 1772 and the pair used the theory to explain his results. The residue of air left after burning, in fact a mixture of nitrogen and carbon dioxide, was sometimes referred to as "phlogisticated air", having taken up all of the phlogiston. Conversely, when oxygen was first discovered it was thought to be "dephlogisticated air", capable of combining with more phlogiston and thus supporting combustion for longer than ordinary air.[5]j.mastanrao.chemistry mentorandhra pradeshindiae mail: jmrao2006@gmail.com
What to be accurate a theory must continue to explain?
To be accurate, a theory must continue to explain what
What are the bad points of the Phlogiston theory?
The Phlogiston theory was unable to explain certain chemical reactions, such as the combination of metals with oxygen. It also lacked experimental support and was eventually replaced by the more accurate oxygen theory of combustion. Additionally, the concept of phlogiston was found to be vague and arbitrary.
Is phlogiston considered a scientific knowledge?
No. Phlogiston was a theory considered to be fact and actually hindered scientific knowledge until it was discredited. The theory was used to explain certain observations about flame, oxidation, and the formation of certain compounds, most noticeably cinnabar. As with some theories, phlogiston used variable factors to explain anomalies. For instance it was assumed to have negative weight under certain circumstances. Once oxidation was properly understood phlogiston theory was no longer considered true.
What evidence is there to prove phlogiston theory of burning was correct?
The phlogiston theory has been debunked by the discovery of oxygen. When materials burn, they combine with oxygen, not phlogiston as believed in the theory. The understanding of combustion and oxidation provided by oxygen led to the rejection of the phlogiston theory.
What evidence was there to suggesst that the phlogiston theory was correct?
Support for the phlogiston theory came from observing that substances such as wood and charcoal released a substance (phlogiston) when burned, leaving behind ash. This was believed to explain the weight loss during combustion. Additionally, the theory was used to account for the process of rusting in metals.
Why did some scientists disagree with the phlogiston theory?
Some scientists disagreed with the phlogiston theory because it could not explain all the observations, such as the weight changes in substances during combustion. Additionally, the discovery of oxygen and its role in combustion provided a more accurate explanation for the phenomena previously attributed to phlogiston.
When iron rusts is it a phlogiston theory or a oxygen theory?
It is a process that involves oxygen. The phlogiston theory has been disprooven for a long time.
Was the phlogiston theory of burning correct?
No, it was not. The phenomena explained by the theory are now known to be a result of oxidation, and phlogiston does not exist.
Who propose the phlogiston theory?
The phlogiston theory was first proposed by Johann Joachim Becher in 1667. This theory is now considered obsolete and was replaced by the oxygen theory.
Was there evidence to prove the phlogiston theory correct?
The phlogiston theory was widely held in the 17th and 18th centuries to explain combustion and oxidation. However, it was eventually disproven with the discovery of oxygen by Lavoisier. This discovery provided a more accurate explanation for the process of combustion.
Who rejected phlogiston theory?
Antoine Lavoisier is credited with rejecting the phlogiston theory. Through his experiments and observations, he was able to show that combustion involved a process of oxidation rather than the release of phlogiston. This led to the development of modern chemistry.
What is the principle of the phlogistan theory?
The phlogiston theory was a scientific hypothesis that proposed that all combustible materials contain a substance called "phlogiston," which is released during combustion. According to the theory, when a substance burns, it loses phlogiston. This theory has been disproven by modern chemistry.
Why was the phlogiston unsatisfactory?
The concept of phlogiston was unsatisfactory because it failed to explain observations in chemistry, such as the increase in weight of metals when they rusted or burned. It was eventually replaced by the theory of combustion with oxygen based on more experimental evidence.
